You're mis-interpreting what Auron says. "Its a gift from Jecht" in no way implies the sword was used by Jecht himself, it means only that, its a gift to Tidus from him, there is no reason to assume Jecht used it before Tidus did. Furthermore, that is highly unlikely anyway since the sword is a completely different weapon from the sword shown in Jecht's artwork and used by the Final Aeon. If the sword was indeed the same weapon as in the art it would be a different story, but this is not the case. Now, stop the edit warring please. Doreiku Kuroofangu 16:53, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- If you're so certain you're right and want other people to comment on it, start a discussion on the talk page. In the meantime the edit warring if over, do it again and I'll rollback it. Doreiku Kuroofangu 17:00, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Now you're just speculating. "I'll buy my son a sword since I know they're useful". This is a completely different sentence from the original "its a gift from Jecht". You're reading too much into it and stretching the quote to say something it doesn't. Doreiku Kuroofangu 17:05, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
The Trivia in question says "Reference that he uses a sword". A reference is a proof. That he gave a sword to his son, while it does give a hint that Jecht may use a sword, it does not prove it. Because it's not a proof, it cannot be added to the trivia. KujaRhapsodos 17:53, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
First, removing talk page messages is vandalism, if you want them gone use an archive like I did. Second, I have run out of patience for your antics several times over now, you haven't responded to civility so I'm going to try hostility. You have edit warred and harassed me, refusing to leave me alone when I'm trying to work on articles, and won't take a hint to back off. Taking the issue to Jecht's talk page means leaving it off mine, learn to do that. Here is the reference, watch and alleviate some of your ignorance, since you obviously can't be bothered to pay attention during gameplay, if you've even played X at all. Stop using tortured logic and speculation to back up your opinions which are just plain wrong. And for god's sake, it is spelled ALLUSION.
I will say this one final time and do not reply to me on my talk page because I won't even bother reading it if you do - shut up, leave me alone, and in the future when you edit an article have some understanding of the subject matter. Doreiku Kuroofangu 18:10, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
You aren't allowed to remove messages on your talk page unless it's blatant vandalism.
|I will not be disturbed by mortal men.|
|Thank you for experimenting with the Final Fantasy Wiki.|
Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Head over to the Sandsea for any other tests you want to do. In addition, please refrain from further testing on the pages of the Final Fantasy Wiki. Have a nice day.
|Those who oppose me shall burn in hellfire!|
|Please stop adding nonsense to the Final Fantasy Wiki.
Doing so is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, head over to the Sandsea. Thank you.
I actually tried for a rational argumentation. Drake also argued, but he gets carried off easily when he sees bad logic, thus the anger in his words. If you think we didn't use good logic, then please reread what you wrote. You're the one who went easily into the way of sophisms and such. While my two comrads (Drake and Crono) are not open to discussion with you anymore, I am. Please respond if you want. KujaRhapsodos 18:33, July 26, 2010 (UTC)