FANDOM


(+)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
=="Strength"==
 
=="Strength"==
 
I notice on our battle articles we refer to characters by their job classes. Can't we just refer to them by their actual names? It seems a bit tedious to do otherwise, and confusing since users aren't going to understand, or necessarily know to check the links. [[Special:Contributions/79.69.194.26|79.69.194.26]] 17:58, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
 
I notice on our battle articles we refer to characters by their job classes. Can't we just refer to them by their actual names? It seems a bit tedious to do otherwise, and confusing since users aren't going to understand, or necessarily know to check the links. [[Special:Contributions/79.69.194.26|79.69.194.26]] 17:58, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
  +
:I don't see why not. The same was done in FF8 battle so I assumed this was the proper format although it makes little sense. [[User:Catuse167|Catuse167]] 22:43, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:43, August 6, 2011

Does this really count as a clear-cut battle? I'm not so convinced. Haveanicedays 10:34, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

I would consider it as such since it has more losses than, say the Battle over the Floating Continent and a lot more action than such. But what does anyone else think? Catuse167 15:55, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
In any way, this isn't a two-way battle as the Diamond Weapon did not fight for Shinra in any way possible. - Henryacores^ 16:37, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

"Strength"

I notice on our battle articles we refer to characters by their job classes. Can't we just refer to them by their actual names? It seems a bit tedious to do otherwise, and confusing since users aren't going to understand, or necessarily know to check the links. 79.69.194.26 17:58, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

I don't see why not. The same was done in FF8 battle so I assumed this was the proper format although it makes little sense. Catuse167 22:43, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.