Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Pig (ability)". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

Because Dissidia now has a place on this page, The FFIV tag should be changed. Usually, on things that could enter future games (spells, statuses, items and shit) we give a series tag. Pig (ability), Pig (status), or no move?  I Lion Heart I 18:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Because I know how much things are ignored. If no admin says anything I shall move it.  I Lion Heart I 16:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, this really should have been under (Ability)/(Status) to begin with. Which one is another matter. Diablocon 16:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
This debate has been going for a long time. Berserk (ability), Doom (status). Actually, Doom has two articles for it now; Doom (ability) was written. Though I believe it us unnecessary. Most of our pages use the (Ability) tag if they are both a spell and status. See this ("Category:Status effects"). Also there is "Burn (Chocobo Tales)", which should be moved to "Burn (status)".  I Lion Heart I 16:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Since the spell's called 'Piggy', why not call the article 'Piggy'? Only the status effect is called 'Pig'.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.