Gilgamesh-ffv-ios-portrait.png
Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Magick (ability type)". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

Merging[edit source]

BlueHighwind TA.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
Theatrhythm Ultimate Weapon.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png

*

NeA-Leon.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
NeA-Leon.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
NeA-Leon.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
NeA-Leon.png
PartyHostCrown.png

I didn't get my word in. You know how Bolt and Lit redirect to thunder? It's because even though they have different names, they're the same magic. Black Magick includes the same types spells as Black Magic. If two pages exist, one with the "K" and one without, then we may as well just merge them. It's contradicting the entire wiki. Go on, why not make three different articles for the same magic spell, known more commonly and most recent as "Thunder"? Yes, this is exclusive to the Ivalice Alliance... the spelling is exclusive, not the thought of Black Magic.  ILHI 12:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Leading on to what I was about to suggest, we could type at the top "{{See Also|* Magic}}" in the cases of White, Black and Time - like we do for such things as jobs (eg. Black Mage (Final Fantasy))  ILHI 13:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Just dropping by to say that (if I remember correctly) the original Japanese games have no difference in spelling of the usual "magic" and Ivalice Alliance's "magick", and this difference is only present in the English translations (and in those translations based on the English ones) --Painocus 01:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Merging (Again)[edit source]

BlueHighwind TA.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
BlueHighwind TA.png
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
Ff8-selphie.jpg
--
Eric Ryan Jones, Master Black Mage — 03:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC) (edit conflict)
I agree with BlueHighwind here. If it's the same thing in a version and only differs in name here, then I see it as synonymous.
--
Galbana-ffxiirw.png
ACRudeBox.PNG

Yes, I am just a little noob who either doesn't know, or won't bother to go check how to create talk bubbles, but now I'm going to tell a few things, regardless of my noob status. BlueHighwind, you should be silent once in a while. Your attitude towards everything is terrible. Is it such a big deal this article exists? If it is, I'll give you few points for the reason it exists.

- As said before, Magic of Ivalice, called Magick, is divided into more sections than other incarnations of magic in Final Fantasy.
- When there are people who seek information about Magick, yes, Magick, the Magic of Ivalice, especially when they want to read gameplay related information of Magick, there's plenty of this article to offer.

It's just an article. Will you next start whining that there are too many walkthroughts and all of them should be merged with yours? (Implying any living soul could take all that rant...) Let it be, you've heard the song, haven't you? Regards, ZaFlareStar 13/5/2010, 21:41

Rename the Page[edit source]

Should we move this page to Magick (Ivalice)? The name Magick is also used for a spell in the 4 Heroes of Light. --Miphares (talk) 12:34, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Honestly, this page is unnecessary. It should be merged into Magic (term). Ivalice having its own naming-scheme isn't reason enough to be separate.
But yeah, "Magick (Ivalice)" would be the correct destination. 92.24.164.75 15:15, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Support merging to Magic (term). Make this a disambig?Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 15:22, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Yup. 92.24.164.75 15:25, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

I agree, moving this to the Magic (term) page sounds like a better idea. So then, are we good to go or should I place the Merge template and we get more input on this? --Miphares (talk) 23:55, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.