Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Madeen (summon)". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

Should this page just be called "Madeen"? The (Summon) tag doesn't disambiguate from the other "Madeen" at least.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 10:44, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Both Madeen and Maduin were called with both names in at least one game so these names have to be a disam page. here's what we have right now:

  • Maduin - the disam page for "Maduin" and "Madeen"
  • Madeen - the redirect page to Maduin (both names are currently sharing the same disam page)
  • [[Maduin (Summon)]] - for the FFVI Maduin and his cameo appearances
  • Madeen (summon) - for the FFIX, FFTA, FFTA2 (recurring?) and other appearances

not sure about the (Summon) tag but yeah it doesn't disambiguate them from each other. however they need to have a tag since their names were used for a disam page. Monterossa (talk) 11:51, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

hmm... has Maduin ever been called Madeen in any version? I'm not sure about it. Monterossa (talk) 11:59, March 3, 2015 (UTC)


We already have Maduin (Final Fantasy VI) for Maduin as a character. And those Dissidia equipment seem to be a mistranslation. Monterossa (talk) 13:28, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

FFIX summon info would be on the "character" page, separating them would just be insanity...Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 15:15, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

If all Maduins are are in reference to the FFVI Maduin, Maduin (Summon) can be deleted and the summon info moved to "Other appearances" on Maduin (Final Fantasy VI). "Maduin" can be a disambig for Maduin (Final Fantasy VI) and the FFTA2 summon (actually Madeen). Madeen can be an article without a tag for the recurring summon.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 15:54, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

I think it's ok to leave Maduin's character page and summon page separated. Maduin as a character is a playable character at one point in the game and deserve a character page while Maduin as a summon deserves a page as well. Monterossa (talk) 20:02, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

No, see how Gilgamesh doesn't have a Gilgamesh (Summon) page etc.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 21:01, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.