Final Fantasy Wiki
Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Madeen". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

Maduin is NOT Madeen[]

Maduin is a mistranslation of Madeen, they are meant to represent the same summon. So because they are basically the same summon, the two articles should be merged
--Nahald 17:40, 9 November 2006 (PDT)

I second that motion.
--MarioFanaticXV 03:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Whoa whoa whoa! Mog, the form Madeen took when protecting Eiko, is a Female. I think we can lay this one to rest.
--Auron Kaizer 02:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Maduin is in fact NOT a mistranslation of Madeen. Two differences: One, Maduin is Non-Elemental, and Madeen is Holy. Second Maduin is Terra's father and a Gigas. Madeen disguised herself as Mog, Eiko's childhood guardian. Eiko also states "Someday, Mog and I will grow up to be fine ladies and wear our Ribbons!"
--LuvLuv G2000 00:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

1. Same word in Japanese, which is supposed to be a take on Mael Duin.
2. Fenrir also has a different attack in IX. It's still Fenrir. koku 03:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, in fact they are. They are both named "マディーン" in japanese - that's Madiin, pronounced in English as Madeen. They are both lionesque (one more so than the other, but the basic design is the same), and why should they have the same name and basic appearance if they are not the same basic summon.
-As for gender - so? Shiva is not the same being in each game (in FFX, for example, she used to be a person), but we admit that it is the same basic summon (or at least, summon template).74.140.118.84 08:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree. I want the merge
So you are, in fact, claiming that the Shiva appearing in every incarnation in Final Fantasy is the same being? What about in VI? It certainly used to be human in that one. Shiva has a different personality in almost every game she is a character in!KrytenKoro 18:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Maduin and Madeen are one and the same. As 74.140.118.84 has reasoned perfectly. There's more than enough evidence for a merge.--Goldberry2000 18:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I see the point y'all are trying to make about the name translation... but something makes me suspect the ones in favor of merging haven't played that much of FFVI. I don't think the two should be merged, on the grounds that the name is all that they have in common.

-Madeen's role in the game is as a Summon.

-Maduin's role is as a character.

-Different elements.

-Different appearances.

-Different gender.

Other than the name, I see no evidence that they are or were intended to be the same creature/person. If the name were the deciding factor, then FFIX's Mog should be merged with the Mog from FFVI.

I agree. The merge is unneeded as there isn't enough proof for a solid connection other than name. Manduin and Madeen are both important characters that share very diffrent personalities and appearances. Manduin, being the father of the main character deserves his own article the same way Ject from X does. Also, I find the Shiva arguement very confusing as Shiva has actually remained the same since 3, when she first appeared. Shiva has always been a scantly clad woman, appearing to be in her mid twenty's, with blue skin, and power over ice. Ifrit too has stayed the same, being a fire based summon, demonic/animilistic in appearance, always well muscled, and sporting some horns. Contrarily, Madeen and Manduin differ in apperant age, in appearance, in gender, in the very basis of their attack, with one being Non-elemental and the other Holy. Even though Madeen may have been based on Manduin and may even be a diliberate nod back by the developers, they differ so greatly that merging their articles would be unneccesary and pointless. I do agree that a minor note should be added to both mentioning the apperant link, however it should be treated the same as all the other "nod backs" to the previous 2D games found in FFIX.~Ralis

I don't think they should merge for the above mentiond reasons. If we were to merge these two, we should also by the same logic merge all the Cid's into one catagory 'cause they all have the same name. kaerF

You mean like this page? Are You Serious 12:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Maduin is NOT Madeen II[]



Cid Isn't even the same person/race/thing in every final fantasy and he does have all his pages merged. I can't understand why Madeen/Maduin wouldn't. Zak Undersn

Because each game still refers to him as Cid, and doens't randomly change the spelling to Sid, Cyd, Syd etc. (Alright, Sid is used once). Diablocon 20:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Not even Cid's name is the same every game (Cidolfus appears twice). The only thing Cids share is that "vehicle thingey", and in some cases not even that. Maduin looks as a mistranslation of Madeen, or vice-versa, like Cid/Sid. Zak Undersn

Edit Conflict- Definite no to a merge. One is a character page; the other is a summon page. Madeen can be mentioned on Maduin; but I can't get my head around Madeen linking to Maduin for summon details.  ILHI 20:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Or we could make a disambig for one name, allowing the other to redirect. On this "The recurring summon" ("Madeen (summon)") -- "The character from Final Fantasy VI" (@"Maduin (Final Fantasy VI)" -- And anything else. Maduin (FFVI)'s page using ==As a summon== (or whatever title) -- {{main|Madeen (summon)}}. That sounds fine to me.  ILHI 17:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

How is the FFTA2 version different from the FFTA version? Also, considering the fact that the FFTA2 version, a Holy summon, is merged with the FFVI version, can't we just merge them to a summon article and a character article(s)? I mean, compare Shiva in FFVI to Shiva in FFU, that's a drastic visual difference. Or Exodus between FFT and FFXII. Between FFVI, FFT, and FFIX really isn't that much, comparitively.Glorious CHAOS! 13:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Madeen IS Maduin[]