Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Final Fantasy X series". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

Giving some detail about each title like Compilation of Final Fantasy VII might be nice. JBed (talk) 18:33, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Article Name[edit source]

seconded. it did fine without the title for the last 10 years.. and afaik i've never heard anyone use 'spira series' until it got coined here. also agree with no logo. lets not create stuff for the sake of it and stick to official material where possible. "Final Fantasy X Series" works fine. "Lightning Saga", in contrast is different because its developer-coined.--Arciele Spira (talk) 15:13, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
Yeah...agree a bit. I think it should just show FFX logo or maybe just the logo artwork with no text then, fanmade logo looks dodgy on a wiki. Article for all releases that take place in the same world is a good idea but tough with the naming. Spira Series doesn't even fully work since the world kinda treats Dream Zanarkand and Farplane as worlds separate from Spira.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 15:21, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
I was going to state my agreement with "Spira Series", but then Kelt reminded me of the whole Dream Zanarkand isn't in Spira thing. Which is totally annoying, because I don't know why you would give and use a name to the known world but not the whole planet.
I don't like "Final Fantasy X series" because it automatically would exclude any Spira-based content outside of the title. Fortunately though, that's not at all an issue here because no such thing exists. Unlike Ivalice which appears everywhere.
Whatev'. Yeah, that logo should be deleted. X's logo or nothing. JBed (talk) 17:13, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
My opinion is simple: we have Final Fantasy V series, Final Fantasy X series is a much better name for as long as nothing else appears on Spira, it's even better in fact because nothing set on Spira does not include "FFX" in the title". Since the first Spira title was Final Fantasy X, I see no perceivable reason Square would ever set something on Spira without including "FFX" in the title, but with Ivalice, FFXII came much later. Even if they made a full-blown Blitzball game or something, "FFX Blitzball" would likely be the title. Also the logo is (not too poorly made) fan-made logo, so that's a definite no.--Magicite-ffvi-ios.png Technobliterator TC 17:18, December 4, 2014 (UTC)

what about Final Fantasy IV Series? currently we're using Final Fantasy IV: The Complete Collection (in Template:Navbox series) but that's just the bundle name for PSP, not the sub-series name. Monterossa (talk) 08:53, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

i've always thought of the complete collection as more of a product name than anything. i'd support just FF# Series for everything for uniformity.--Arciele Spira (talk) 13:45, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
I support FFIV Series too, always have.--Magicite-ffvi-ios.png Technobliterator TC 13:48, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

So, have we agreed on the rename? Also, what other series articles we;ll need beside FFIV and FFV? Dissidia, maybe?—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 20:58, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

Support "Final Fantasy X Series".Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 02:34, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
Ditto--Arciele Spira (talk) 11:01, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
So... are we changing it or not? Monterossa (talk) 20:00, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
I was under the impression we're just waiting for someone to actually do it.--Arciele Spira (talk) 05:25, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.