Talk:Final Fantasy III weapons

Yumino - ♪♫~ - Talk - 22:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Could someone please clarify this? ^^ Is the Millenium Rod spelled that way in the game, or is this just a typo in the article?

Magic Knight

TenzaZangetsu Special:Editcount/TenzaZangetsu 25 July 2009 (UTC)  -   "Give you a couple of severed heads and a pile of dead cows and you're Mr. Sunshine…": We need to add which equipment the Magic Knight use.

Heeeey Draaaaake!

		Xenomic TALK - 22:17, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
		Care to reformat this table like the FFIX/FFV Weapon pages? We need to add Price listings here somehow, and well....it'll be super smushed if we add the column as it is....mayhaps we can do something about that like putting the Jobs as the bottom row (under the main info)? Other things that need done is to add in a column for NES/DS differences (this is mainly with Attack Power...though I guess we could do NES/DS Attack, and do it like 8/10 or whatever...

NES vs DS

This page should make it clearer which weapons are exclusive to each version of the game (NES/DS). If there are enough differences, perhaps the page should be split like the FFIV Weapons page. TheomanZero (talk) 03:15, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

I would like the page to be split between the DS version and Famicom as well, because for example while the Onion Knight job has all the weapons in the DS version, it's the Ninja job that has all the weapons in the Famicom version. 86.183.58.131 18:08, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

Equips for Jobs

I feel also more work needs to be done to indicate the differences in what weapons can be equipped for what jobs. For instance, the Boomerang exists in all versions of the game but in the original NES it can only be equipped by Thief and Ninja. This is pretty important because when you first get to Amur there are no arrows for sale anywhere and it makes it important to consider if you want to keep a Hunter (aka Ranger) or switch to something else. Joshuabeane23 (talk) 21:44, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Famicom and Remake thing

Instead of writing Famicom or Remake next to cost or what not can't we just put FC (that is what the NES page also shortened it to, yes I checked) and 3D since it may be easier and may clean up the page a bit (at least in my view) if so I can change it I will, if not then whatever it's cool I'll leave it.--Xion V. (talk) 06:04, August 31, 2015 (UTC)

or it could also be NES instead of FC just throwing this in just in case--Xion V. (talk) 06:18, August 31, 2015 (UTC)

		Xenomic TALK - 07:09, September 1, 2015 (UTC)
		Personally, I vouch for having a separate page just for the two versions, like with FFIV. Mainly because the equipment and items tend to be quite different from one another (spells might be able to bypass this rule).

Heh, that's the thing I originally was going to propose but uh... didn't obviously. I agree though on that note--Xion V. (talk) 07:39, September 1, 2015 (UTC)

2D and 3D should be separated, they are quite different. The reason I separated FFIV is because the reader/viewer would find it more easy to get the information they want for the different versions. Fenrir9 (talk) 11:01, September 1, 2015 (UTC)