Enough expository banter!
- Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (
~~~~) or five in a talk bubble.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- Please read our Conduct guideline. In a nutshell: be polite, assume good faith.
- For general non-wiki discussion on this topic, feel free to discuss on Discord or Discussions.
There is a Final Fantasy X "Alpha" disc on this site: 
I've personally tried it, and it features a ton of debugging options. There are alot of debug rooms that you can select from at the main menu. There are also some little differences in the game, from different voice clips, to the weapons and armor abilities having different names(Break Hp Limit=Mega hp, Evade and counter= evade and hit, etc).
Here are more some screen shots from the link:
http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s71/SymbianFreak/FFX%20Alpha/KTV2010-07-1614-24-04-23.jpg http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s71/SymbianFreak/FFX%20Alpha/KTV2010-07-1614-29-32-47.jpg http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s71/SymbianFreak/FFX%20Alpha/KTV2010-07-1614-30-35-52.jpg http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s71/SymbianFreak/FFX%20Alpha/KTV2010-07-1614-30-56-08.jpg
I am using the disc on my soft modded ps2(thanks to esr and free mcboot).
Final Fantasy IV Inconsistency[edit source]
Under the "After Years" topic, it states that the Tokita Sword was named after Tokita, who directed both the original FFIV, and the sequel. Yet, his own profile states that he was just a game designer and scenario writer for FFIV, and FFIV's article states that Sakaguchi directed it. I'm pretty sure I know which answer is correct, but in case I'm wrong, I'll leave it up to someone else to correct. Flamemasterelan 07:51, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out. He indeed only directed the sequel.Keltainentoukokuu 14:22, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
Move page to "Dummied content". This would match the category and also make more sense. "Content" refers to anything (that has been dummied), a "feature" is generally a word I would not use to describe most things on this page. I wouldn't call a dummied item or enemy a feature. JBed 17:32, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Good you done that: it always bugged me... that article's name.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) 17:40, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
This article is too big, can you add some ====subheadings====?
Kotaku's made some blog posts of FF games' dummied content using this article as base. They have linked back to us. http://kotaku.com/5968092/heres-what-didnt-make-the-final-fantasy-tactics-final-cut Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 01:42, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
Some games could get their own articles[edit source]
Well, I was thinking of expanding FFVI article and going into more details, but doing so would double or nearly triple the current existing FFVI entry which I think is bad. There are still a lot of stuff missing from it, including pictures of the unused tiles/objects (lots), usused story lines and battle lines (there's quite a few). FFVII and FFT could use their own pages as well. I think the wiki should go into details on what was dummied out and not simply put "Various lines of dialogue were dummied out in the final version" and simply just put one line and not list all of them, etc. There could be more games too that could get their own articles, I just took a quickly glance over the article and these three games came up as being quite large. Fenrir9 (talk) 14:48, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed on giving them deeper coverage since we can provide it. Subpages would work I think. Doreiku Kuroofangu 14:54, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Before I get started working on FFVI (time for me to create my first sandbox) subpage would be Dummied content / Final Fantasy VI <- without the two spaces or Dummy Content (Final Fantasy VI) when I bring it to mainspace? Fenrir9 (talk) 16:03, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
I'm about to move the FFVI Dummied content into main space, so will we name it List of Final Fantasy VI Dummied content and make Dummied content the parent page? Fenrir9 (talk) 23:30, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
- "I think the wiki should go into details on what was dummied out and not simply put "Various lines of dialogue were dummied out in the final version" and simply just put one line and not list all of them"
No. VII (and VIII) have tons of unused text. It's not feasible. We should list the most interesting, i.e. unused events, or texts that hint towards potential events that were left out.
And even then, we wouldn't be giving the specific dialogue. If you are interested, there is an Unused Text Series for FFVII on TheLifestream. So many. 18.104.22.168 14:31, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree, regardless on how many dialogue lines were dummied out, all the dummied out stuff should be covered on the wiki. This is the wiki of Final Fantasy information where it covers all FF games, and it should have all the info available to its users. Not a simple, too much info to be put into wiki, go to this place if you want more information, etc. The wiki should document all info, and this part of the wiki deals about the dummied out stuff and should contain all the available info that the users can get their hands on, regardless of being interesting or not. Fenrir9 (talk) 16:39, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
Dummied lines between Balthier and Cid.[edit source]
So, just curious. Does this mean that since animation and voices were left out that the actual script for the scene is still in the original game? because if it is, I would be really interested in it. ClaireRhods (talk) 23:34, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
Final Fantasy V "Final Fantasy" item[edit source]
Does it exist? I don't see it. In RPGe there's an item called "by RPGe", which is item 255. And this same item exists in both PS and GBA, here referred to as "FF". It is true FF are the initials of Final Fantasy, but it's also true that FF is 255 in hexadecimal notation.
Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII Unknown Shields, Garbs and Swords.[edit source]
I was editing my save file and I decided to add Cloud Strife DLC items. When loading the save file, they appeared to be the unknown type. I could not use them, they did not appear when creating/editing schemata, but appeared in the items section. My theory is, that the DLC has to be installed on the system, then the items would appear as SOLDIER 1st Class, SOLDIER's Band and Buster Sword. Maitsukas (talk) 12:40, August 22, 2014 (UTC)