Enough expository banter!
- Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (
~~~~) or five in a talk bubble.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- Please read our Conduct guideline. In a nutshell: be polite, assume good faith.
- For general non-wiki discussion on this topic, feel free to discuss on Discord or Discussions.
this article makes blue mages seem unfairly underrated. i don,t see white mages breathing fire.Ozsmith0 01:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see any bias here one way or the other. By the way, I don't see any Blue Mages using "Holy". --BlueHighwind 01:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
ah, but a blue mage could be attacked by a "holy-like" creature(using a similar spell) and then learn it. when a white mage gets hit by fire, it feeblely heals itself until it dies.Ozsmith0 01:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Heck, one could always stereotype a white mage or black mage, but neither was as versatile as the blue mage. I mean, a red mage was always a solid well-balanced mage and knew the incredibly deadly DoubleCast, but that's the only thing, in my opinion, that they have over the Blue Mage, always a type that seems to have almost limitless potential, and are a bit better with a blade to boot.22.214.171.124 00:04, July 11, 2010 (UTC)Shoft
Would Gau(FF6) count as a blue mage? He can learn monsters abilities. ```I wish to remain unnamed