Final Fantasy Wiki
No edit summary
m (Fenrir9 moved page Talk:Aeshma to Talk:Aeshma (Final Fantasy X-2): Make way for a disambiguation page.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=I'm removing that enemy as a related one. It's from a compeletly different game.}}
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=I'm removing that enemy as a related one. It's from a compeletly different game.}}
{{ILHI|16:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|It's not a completely different game, so to speak, same world, just a sequel. TBH, I think he should get a mention in the article for being similar, but not under related enemies.
+
{{User:ILHI/T|16:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|It's not a completely different game, so to speak, same world, just a sequel. TBH, I think he should get a mention in the article for being similar, but not under related enemies.
   
 
Edit: there.}}
 
Edit: there.}}
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=(Dang edit conflict...)That works. But if we do that, then it would have to happen with almost every enemy, because the same types of fiends are in both games. Oh well I guess.}}
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=(Dang edit conflict...)That works. But if we do that, then it would have to happen with almost every enemy, because the same types of fiends are in both games. Oh well I guess.}}
{{ILHI|16:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|Hmm. Yeah, I found that annoying in FFX-2, how they bought enemies back, barely changed them and gave them a new name. I suppose it's not obligatory, but it could help viewers of the wiki, which is why we have the related enemies section in the first place.}}
+
{{User:ILHI/T|16:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|Hmm. Yeah, I found that annoying in FFX-2, how they bought enemies back, barely changed them and gave them a new name. I suppose it's not obligatory, but it could help viewers of the wiki, which is why we have the related enemies section in the first place.}}
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=Yes, enemies are reused in all Final Fantasies, but I guess they took this one to an extreme because they are in the same world. 200+ new types of enemies aren't just going to appear while 200+ go near extinct in 2 years. *shrug*
 
{{Gamer2127Text|text=Yes, enemies are reused in all Final Fantasies, but I guess they took this one to an extreme because they are in the same world. 200+ new types of enemies aren't just going to appear while 200+ go near extinct in 2 years. *shrug*
   
 
So you think they should go under related enemies...hmm...I guess that could work. I always used that for enemies from the same game, but it can be added for FFX enemies.}}
 
So you think they should go under related enemies...hmm...I guess that could work. I always used that for enemies from the same game, but it can be added for FFX enemies.}}
{{ILHI|17:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|We could put them under a subsection "<nowiki>===Final Fantasy X===</nowiki>", or put in brackets, "(Final Fantasy X)" next to them.
+
{{User:ILHI/T|17:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)|We could put them under a subsection "<nowiki>===Final Fantasy X===</nowiki>", or put in brackets, "(Final Fantasy X)" next to them.
   
 
Anyone else wanna suggest something?}}
 
Anyone else wanna suggest something?}}

Latest revision as of 00:18, 13 September 2012

Luneth-DarkKnight

It's not a completely different game, so to speak, same world, just a sequel. TBH, I think he should get a mention in the article for being similar, but not under related enemies.

Edit: there.  ILHI 16:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Luneth-DarkKnight

Hmm. Yeah, I found that annoying in FFX-2, how they bought enemies back, barely changed them and gave them a new name. I suppose it's not obligatory, but it could help viewers of the wiki, which is why we have the related enemies section in the first place.  ILHI 16:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Luneth-DarkKnight

We could put them under a subsection "===Final Fantasy X===", or put in brackets, "(Final Fantasy X)" next to them.

Anyone else wanna suggest something?  ILHI 17:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)