FANDOM


(Sure, why not?)
m (Nah, it's fine.)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
#No, at the beginning, everyone will be happy about it but later no one will give a crap about it so...no. [[User:TenzaZangetsu|TenzaZangetsu]] 22:51, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
#No, at the beginning, everyone will be happy about it but later no one will give a crap about it so...no. [[User:TenzaZangetsu|TenzaZangetsu]] 22:51, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I'm gonna agree with what Scathe said. --<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting">[[User:SilverCrono|<font color="gray">Silver</font>]][[User talk:SilverCrono|<font color="navy">Crono</font>]]</span> 22:55, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I'm gonna agree with what Scathe said. --<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting">[[User:SilverCrono|<font color="gray">Silver</font>]][[User talk:SilverCrono|<font color="navy">Crono</font>]]</span> 22:55, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  +
#No. I just learnt at #wikia that the thing only takes into account edit counts, as opposed to fewer but substantial edits. There's no justice in this being the only criterion being followed. [[User:Faethin|<font color="dimgray" face="minstrel" size="3">'''Fëasindë'''</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk: Faethin|<font color="black">''te audio''</font>]] </sup> 00:10, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
   
 
==Comments==
 
==Comments==

Revision as of 00:10, August 5, 2010

FFWiki forum logo
Forums: Index > Rin's Travel Agency > Archive > Wikia now has achievements


In what has got to certainly got to be the most novel addition to wikia, you can now enable achivements for your wiki. Read about it here:

Wikia Achievements Help page

Unlike so many other recent new additions, I'm not against this. For one thing, they didn't force it on us. Even if they did, I wouldn't mind because it's just some harmless fun that doesn't alter anything about the wiki (plus I love the concept of achievements and always welcome them being integrated into anything).

So yeah, little poll here. Shall we turn them on? Diablocon 21:23, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sure, why not?

  1. Seems like the Merit Award, or Barnstar, done right. BLUER一番 21:57, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Because we have failed to come up with a working award system. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 22:30, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Breaking the habit of a lifetime, I know. Yes there will be people who will abuse the system, but if it encourages users to edit the wiki more often, then I'm all for it. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 23:09, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Because I like to brag. have my efforts rewarded with browser-slowing goodness. 15px-358_icon.png 死の 15px-358_icon.png 23:39, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Nah, it's fine.

  1. The concept for these is good. It could be a great way to motivate people to start editing things. However, a few things do bother me. Firsly, these awards would be displayed on the page. While this seems like common sense, I am wary as followed pages single-handedly screwed up the format of most userpages (that, and they were a dumb idea). Secondly, it could become competitive, with users making dumb edits to make the leaderboards. Also, these awards seem to be about editcount, and not contributions, which I don't like. So yeah, unsurprisingly, I'm against it. ScatheMote 21:49, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  2. No, at the beginning, everyone will be happy about it but later no one will give a crap about it so...no. TenzaZangetsu 22:51, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I'm gonna agree with what Scathe said. --SilverCrono 22:55, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  4. No. I just learnt at #wikia that the thing only takes into account edit counts, as opposed to fewer but substantial edits. There's no justice in this being the only criterion being followed. Fëasindë te audio 00:10, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

T4HoL-Kuore
occu-27.png
Winterwolf ff1 psp
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.