FANDOM


Line 56: Line 56:
   
 
@Blue again: If you don't care, don't say anything. The point of this thread was so that the admins '''do not''' just give orders to the "diseased robots" and name pages as we wish. As you can see, I'm trying to be open here. Perhaps I should take your advice and totally disregard this issue, wait for users to make their own personal moves, and then rollback any that I don't like. </sarcasm> Your "goes with whatever feels the most natural" whim is nebulous.}}
 
@Blue again: If you don't care, don't say anything. The point of this thread was so that the admins '''do not''' just give orders to the "diseased robots" and name pages as we wish. As you can see, I'm trying to be open here. Perhaps I should take your advice and totally disregard this issue, wait for users to make their own personal moves, and then rollback any that I don't like. </sarcasm> Your "goes with whatever feels the most natural" whim is nebulous.}}
  +
{{BlueHighwind
  +
|time=12:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
  +
|text=I never said anything about the "admins" being the problem. I know your powers are minor. I said "hive mind". As in all of us. As for "whatever feels the most natural", perhaps it should be clearer. First of all, always having titles is stupid. And never having is equally as stupid. Both are completely arbitrary designations and most likely would take away from the best possible names for the articles (if such a things exists, I'm doubtful, but this thread seems to be assuming so):
  +
  +
*If we ''never'' have titles: "Princess Sarah", the only name she is ''ever'' called in FFI, would become "Sarah (Final Fantasy)". If you so desperately need a rule, make sure monarchs and nobility keep their titles. If the title changes, just keep the one they are most easily associated with. Or the least spoilish. ("Princess Garnet" would not become "Queen Garnet" then.)
  +
  +
*If we ''always'' have titles: "Cecil Harvey" becomes "Lord Captain Cecil Harvey", which is just silly. He's called that ''once'' by a Red Wing that doesn't even have a name. He's just called "Cecil" most of the time. Also, on the topic of Beatrix, I think she's most commonly called simply "Beatrix", without any title. I'm not sure there. General Leo, on the other hand, is pretty much always called "General Leo".
  +
  +
And let us remember something important. Even if users constantly move the articles according to personal whim, its not gonna change anything. If Garnet goes from Princess to Queen to nothing, it won't matter. The quality of articles is determined not by which specific thing its called, but by the content. Garnet could turn into "Dagger (Final Fantasy IX)" and still, the article would remain unchanged in quality.}}

Revision as of 12:17, June 10, 2009

FFWiki forum logo
Forums: Index > Rin's Travel Agency > Archive > Titled characters


Galbana-ffxiirw
Rikku White Mage

Template:ILHI

Chibi-Unita


AnotherSmug.png
Galbana-ffxiirw

Template:ILHI

FFVI Terra Branford Menu iOS
Rikku White Mage
BlueHighwind TA
FFVI Terra Branford Menu iOS
BlueHighwind TA
Galbana-ffxiirw
BlueHighwind TA
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.