mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{User:Catuse167/Templates/Bubble|time=05:59, April 17, 2012 (UTC)|text=Category now works. That was my mistake.}} |
{{User:Catuse167/Templates/Bubble|time=05:59, April 17, 2012 (UTC)|text=Category now works. That was my mistake.}} |
||
<s>I don't see why you couldn't have just done ifeq/1/video/video/image</s>(Edit:Okay, now I know why. I would still do ifeq/2/video/video/ifeq/1/video/video/image). Also making it a part of the images template doesn't make sense. Also, I hate videos. That is all. [[User:JBed|JBed]] 18:19, April 17, 2012 (UTC) |
<s>I don't see why you couldn't have just done ifeq/1/video/video/image</s>(Edit:Okay, now I know why. I would still do ifeq/2/video/video/ifeq/1/video/video/image). Also making it a part of the images template doesn't make sense. Also, I hate videos. That is all. [[User:JBed|JBed]] 18:19, April 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Actually, I have no idea how to use any parserFunction but #if. I was educated-guessing when I tried to use #ifexpr (or was it #ifeq?) to make a true/false statement for the video, realized I was fumbling in the dark, and settled for just good old #if. |
||
+ | :What's wrong with videos? They're more informative than images <span style="font-family:Mistral">[[User:Catuse167|Cat]]</span> 00:29, April 18, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:29, 18 April 2012
I propose that we make a template for requesting adding videos to pages that can use them, such as the Glitch pages (and maybe even spell pages, if those were done correctly...maybe), or any other pages that can use them. Yay? Nay? What would be used for the image and quote? Let me hear your opinions on this mateys! | |||
|
Whatever you guys think works! If that's how you think it's best to go about it, then do so. I just think that we need a template for something like this, seeing as seeing a video about something is a lot easier than a still image of something sometimes, and it may get people to try to do vids for stuff. | |||
Catuse says at 03:34, April 17, 2012 (UTC) "Somewhere a zealous god threads these strings between the clouds and the earth, preparing for a symphony it fears impossible to play. And so it threads on, and on, delaying the raise of the conductor's baton." | |||
I like the idea of adding a parameter to {{images}} . | |||
Well, if nobody objects to it, then someone fix that template up to include this, so that it may be used on the appropriate pages. I don't have time myself to do it as I'm currently working on my own RPG atm (and taking notes of what glitches needs vids). | |||
Sealed Cave Glitch will be the test page for this. Just letting you guys know, in case you decide to use a different approach or something. Right now, the Category it's adding it to isn't working very well ^^; | |||
Catuse says at 05:59, April 17, 2012 (UTC) "Somewhere a zealous god threads these strings between the clouds and the earth, preparing for a symphony it fears impossible to play. And so it threads on, and on, delaying the raise of the conductor's baton." | |||
Category now works. That was my mistake. | |||
I don't see why you couldn't have just done ifeq/1/video/video/image(Edit:Okay, now I know why. I would still do ifeq/2/video/video/ifeq/1/video/video/image). Also making it a part of the images template doesn't make sense. Also, I hate videos. That is all. JBed 18:19, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I have no idea how to use any parserFunction but #if. I was educated-guessing when I tried to use #ifexpr (or was it #ifeq?) to make a true/false statement for the video, realized I was fumbling in the dark, and settled for just good old #if.
- What's wrong with videos? They're more informative than images Cat 00:29, April 18, 2012 (UTC)