Changes: Forum:New Skin

Revision as of 22:24, 16 October 2007

Forums: Index > Rin's Travel Agency > Archive > New Skin


		Diablocon - No, the question is; who art thou, ham planks? Shanks! I meant shanks TALK - 13:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		Hecko's noticed it too, so luckily it's not just my PC being crap, but it appears we're being forced to use the new look. Of course, this is totally gay, since the new look sucks balls since it displays information in a terrible way. I've tried setting it back in my preferences, but no luck. I think we should complain to Wikia about this.


		Hecko X^{talk - blog - anime rants} 14:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		My Preferences --> Skin --> Remove mark in "See custom wikis (recommended)" --> Save. P.S. Make sure skin is set to MonoBook.


		Diablocon - No, the question is; who art thou, ham planks? Shanks! I meant shanks TALK - 14:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		Thanks, I didn't want to untick that in case something worse happened. I wonder why it suddenly done this though?


		Hecko X^{talk - blog - anime rants} 14:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		Aaaargh, a tick, that's what it was called! In Denmark it is called a (directly translated) "fly leg", but it just didn't make any sense in English. As for the skin, we've had it coming for a while. One could even try them out ahead of time. I just never liked it that much (read it sucked as hell and annoyed me to no end... no offence to the designer).


		Crazyswordsman - Final Fantasy VI, because Drake says he wants to link to FF7 every day, which is bad because that game is so far inferior to FF6. TALK - 15:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		Are we gonna make a new skin? I know Ren has some css tricks we can use.


		Hecko X^{talk - blog - anime rants} 16:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		I think we should just leave things as they are as to avoid screwing up all the templates used on this wikia. We should probably make a "This wikia is best viewed with the MonoBook-skin"-type message on the front page.


		Pablo618 - ^{I am the Iron man Proto-babil!!} TALK - Time for Dark Matter {{{time}}}



		at first the new skin sucked monkey ball's but now I like it, although there is some crap dificult to see but I'll keep the new one


		TacticAngel TALK - 18:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		I suppose it is wrong of me on some level to say that 'when I show up at a wiki, I expect it to look a certain way' because, as much as this just makes CSM's skin crawl, this is what the Wikipedia looks like. Its stark presentation whispers softly in my ear 'valid authority' while not distracting me with little bells and whistles.


		BlueHighwind ^Q? TALK - So if you care to find me, look to the Western Sky!ツ:



		I want to make it clear to all that when reading my walkthroughs you must switch to MonoBook skin. Any other skin is blasphemy to the sacred test shown within (its like writing Bible passages in human feces). Be sure to switch skins when you link to any of my pages.


		Goldberry2000 - That was a rhetorical question, and the answer was my fist TALK - Sandbox 22:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)



		I fail to see the problem with writing bible passages in human faeces. In fact, more people are likely to read them that way; they draw more attention. Also, people looking at shit are more likely to need religious guideance than people who are enlightened enough to live on thier own steam rather than by the incling of a failing church as the backbone of a failed, false, and collaged religion. That's using Christianity as an example, but I'm sure I could be equally insulting to any other religion. Back on topic: The new skin is hideous.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{BlueHighwind
 |text=I want to make it clear to all that when reading my walkthroughs you must switch to MonoBook skin.  Any other skin is blasphemy to the sacred test shown within (its like writing Bible passages in human feces).  Be sure to switch skins when you link to any of my pages.}}
+{{GB2ktalktext|time= 22:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)|text=I fail to see the problem with writing bible passages in human faeces. In fact, more people are likely to read them that way; they draw more attention. Also, people looking at shit are more likely to need religious guideance than people who are enlightened enough to live on thier own steam rather than by the incling of a failing church as the backbone of a failed, false, and collaged religion. That's using Christianity as an example, but I'm sure I could be equally insulting to any other religion.
+Back on topic: The new skin is hideous.}}