Final Fantasy Wiki
(Let's get this over with)
 
m (Bot: Changing template: Q)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
Let me open the discussion with comments made by ''Bravely Defalt'' producer Tomoya Asano in [http://rpgland.com/2012/10/08/rpgland-interviews-bravely-default-producer-tomoya-asano/ this interview]:
 
Let me open the discussion with comments made by ''Bravely Defalt'' producer Tomoya Asano in [http://rpgland.com/2012/10/08/rpgland-interviews-bravely-default-producer-tomoya-asano/ this interview]:
   
−
{{q|Well, the previous game that I worked on, ''Hikari no 4 Senshi'', was actually titled ''Final Fantasy Gaiden''. So there was a legitimate connection to ''Final Fantasy''. But after we finished that, I wondered, well, what should we do now? '''We could have made something within SE’s main series, like a ''Final Fantasy'' or a ''Dragon Quest'', but I wanted to instead work on creating something with a new feeling, and new brand entirely.'''|Mr. Asano}}
+
{{Quote|Well, the previous game that I worked on, ''Hikari no 4 Senshi'', was actually titled ''Final Fantasy Gaiden''. So there was a legitimate connection to ''Final Fantasy''. But after we finished that, I wondered, well, what should we do now? '''We could have made something within SE’s main series, like a ''Final Fantasy'' or a ''Dragon Quest'', but I wanted to instead work on creating something with a new feeling, and new brand entirely.'''|Mr. Asano}}
   
 
Additionally, Asano stated [https://www.gamespot.com/articles/bravely-default-from-sequel-to-sequel/1100-6417605/ here] that the ''Final Fantasy'' elements are just relics of its early development and remained in the final product to be more familiar to JRPG fans.
 
Additionally, Asano stated [https://www.gamespot.com/articles/bravely-default-from-sequel-to-sequel/1100-6417605/ here] that the ''Final Fantasy'' elements are just relics of its early development and remained in the final product to be more familiar to JRPG fans.
Line 24: Line 24:
 
Please let me know your thoughts and if you are willing to help.
 
Please let me know your thoughts and if you are willing to help.
 
}}
 
}}
  +
{{SCM|time=09:15, December 13, 2019 (UTC)|text=Alternate title: ''Canonicity of Bravely Default, Hopefully For the Last Fucking Time.''
  +
  +
When this topic came up with ''Default'', my opinion was that as a single title with more than a passing resemblance to FFV's job and magic systems, it made sense to include here. When this topic came up with ''Second'', I argued that we brought the topic up way too early and we should talk about it when users that only know English had more information. Said later discussion didn't happen, mostly because a bunch of people were sick of one particular annoying user who had an amazing talent for poisoning what was allegedly their own side of the argument.
  +
  +
We don't need to wait for ''Default II'' to come out. ''Second'' distanced itself from the classes it borrowed from FF to focus on its own classes, only one of which (Astrologian) could be considered related. ''Second'' culled the spell lists it borrowed from FFV. The only FF related thing that has a similar level of prominence in ''Second'' that it did in ''Default'' is that the Seven Deadly Sins from 4HoL are still there. Furthermore, ''Curtain Call'' lists ''Default'' in its non-FF section, instead of the miscellaneous FF section.
  +
  +
We have more than enough proof that the series is not first-tier scope, to the degree that we don't even need to take the words of the dev team into consideration. It is certainly a related series that requires a degree of coverage, but nowhere close to what we currently do.
  +
  +
I am definitely interested in working on a forked site, so let it be clear I'm not just trying to mark a significant chunk of the site as "not our problem lol". It just appears to me that it's not meant to be here.}}
  +
  +
{{HexedTalk|time= 09:26, December 13, 2019 (UTC) |text=So as the person who basically started this chat and is actually vaguely willing to do content work for II, I'm changing my stance from whenever the fuck we first had this chat to, yes, we need to fork it at some point before the release of II, also because I need to actually at least pretend to do something with how staff-y I am.}}
  +
  +
{{KelTalk|time=[[User:Keltainentoukokuu|Keltainentoukokuu]] ([[User talk:Keltainentoukokuu|talk]]) 10:33, December 13, 2019 (UTC)|text=Yay for Bravely Wiki creation. We can link to each other and all that. Some 4 Heroes of Light stuff could be in both wikis if it's in both games. That series can have the proper space to shine in its own wiki.}}
  +
  +
Techno has practically stated all my points on why it should be separated from this wiki at this point. We don't cover the likes of later Mana and SaGa titles on this wiki even if they had their heavier FF-based roots for their first titles. So yeah, let's send them to a new proper Bravely series wiki.
  +
  +
On the topic of 4 Heroes of Light, keep everything here, and just give it a page on the new Bravely series wiki that still redirects to here, similar to our Kingdom Hearts page linking to the KH wiki. The thing is 4 Heroes of Light, despite being called a Gaiden game, is still a just an FF game, even being helm by the King of Traditions himself, Takashi Tokita. --[[User:Miphares|Miphares]] ([[User talk:Miphares|talk]]) 16:23, December 13, 2019 (UTC)--[[User:Miphares|Miphares]] ([[User talk:Miphares|talk]]) 16:23, December 13, 2019 (UTC)
  +
  +
{{SCM|time=20:52, December 13, 2019 (UTC)|text=For the incredibly few shared things (so, uh, jobs, maybe spells/items, and a few bosses), we would be doing the same thing we do for ''Kingdom Hearts'', we give a brief overview and link to our affiliated site. 4HoL content would not be affected, it's first-tier scope, it remains here.}}
  +
  +
If I've understood comments Techno's said on the Discord correctly, we'll be able to start preparing a fork in about a day's time, so if there's any reason why we shouldn't do this, now's the time to speak up. -- {{User:Some Color Mage/sig}} 05:11, December 15, 2019 (UTC)
  +
  +
happy to see this matter finally resolved. happy new year. --[[User:Spira|Arciele Spira]] ([[User talk:Spira|talk]]) 03:41, January 2, 2020 (UTC)
  +
  +
==New wiki created==
  +
Hi all, the new wiki now exists at [[w:c:bravelydefault]]. Not quite finished the main page or logo yet, but the rest is set up. All pages from the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki have been imported, and I also imported a bunch of templates that I use on other wikis I set up as Wiki Manager. Not imported ''Final Fantasy'' templates yet, in case they need changing in any way, though most can just be copypasted.
  +
  +
I'm thinking we give it like a few weeks or so of a "transition" period to move content over, get it perfected on Bravely Default Wiki, and hopefully go through [[w:c:bravelydefault:Special:SpecialPages]] and resolve all/as many maintenance concerns as we can. Namely, I'd start with the WantedTemplates, create (or just copypaste) templates for all of these, and then go through WantedPages, add images, and finally fix any remaining links. The other thing would be creating pages for things like individual spells, which we don't have on BD for the time being.
  +
  +
I've given Hexedmagica and Some Color Mage bureaucrat rights on the wiki, as they agreed to it. I am now serving as the Wiki Manager there, and I'm sure they'll be happy to consider new staff members. In the meantime, we encourage people to edit Bravely Default content on the Bravely Default Wiki. We can consider this a "transition period". Once the wiki's in a good shape, i.e. no maintenance reports and good quality pages, we will begin the process of deleting Bravely Default content from the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki, and replacing it with second-tier scope coverage. Thanks all, and let me know if you have any questions or need help!--{{User:Technobliterator/TalkS}} 22:09, December 18, 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:28, 10 January 2020

FFWiki forum logo
Forums: Index > Rin's Travel Agency > Archive > Forking Bravely Default content to its own wiki (the redux)


Technobliterator
RedWizard-ff1-psp
Some Color Mage / Talk Contribs / / 09:15, December 13, 2019 (UTC)
Alternate title: Canonicity of Bravely Default, Hopefully For the Last Fucking Time.

When this topic came up with Default, my opinion was that as a single title with more than a passing resemblance to FFV's job and magic systems, it made sense to include here. When this topic came up with Second, I argued that we brought the topic up way too early and we should talk about it when users that only know English had more information. Said later discussion didn't happen, mostly because a bunch of people were sick of one particular annoying user who had an amazing talent for poisoning what was allegedly their own side of the argument.

We don't need to wait for Default II to come out. Second distanced itself from the classes it borrowed from FF to focus on its own classes, only one of which (Astrologian) could be considered related. Second culled the spell lists it borrowed from FFV. The only FF related thing that has a similar level of prominence in Second that it did in Default is that the Seven Deadly Sins from 4HoL are still there. Furthermore, Curtain Call lists Default in its non-FF section, instead of the miscellaneous FF section.

We have more than enough proof that the series is not first-tier scope, to the degree that we don't even need to take the words of the dev team into consideration. It is certainly a related series that requires a degree of coverage, but nowhere close to what we currently do.

I am definitely interested in working on a forked site, so let it be clear I'm not just trying to mark a significant chunk of the site as "not our problem lol". It just appears to me that it's not meant to be here.

BS Magnolia Emperor
PFF PuPu

Techno has practically stated all my points on why it should be separated from this wiki at this point. We don't cover the likes of later Mana and SaGa titles on this wiki even if they had their heavier FF-based roots for their first titles. So yeah, let's send them to a new proper Bravely series wiki.

On the topic of 4 Heroes of Light, keep everything here, and just give it a page on the new Bravely series wiki that still redirects to here, similar to our Kingdom Hearts page linking to the KH wiki. The thing is 4 Heroes of Light, despite being called a Gaiden game, is still a just an FF game, even being helm by the King of Traditions himself, Takashi Tokita. --Miphares (talk) 16:23, December 13, 2019 (UTC)--Miphares (talk) 16:23, December 13, 2019 (UTC)


RedWizard-ff1-psp
Some Color Mage / Talk Contribs / / 20:52, December 13, 2019 (UTC)
For the incredibly few shared things (so, uh, jobs, maybe spells/items, and a few bosses), we would be doing the same thing we do for Kingdom Hearts, we give a brief overview and link to our affiliated site. 4HoL content would not be affected, it's first-tier scope, it remains here.

If I've understood comments Techno's said on the Discord correctly, we'll be able to start preparing a fork in about a day's time, so if there's any reason why we shouldn't do this, now's the time to speak up. -- Some Color Mage ~ (Talk) 05:11, December 15, 2019 (UTC)

happy to see this matter finally resolved. happy new year. --Arciele Spira (talk) 03:41, January 2, 2020 (UTC)

New wiki created[]

Hi all, the new wiki now exists at w:c:bravelydefault. Not quite finished the main page or logo yet, but the rest is set up. All pages from the Final Fantasy Wiki have been imported, and I also imported a bunch of templates that I use on other wikis I set up as Wiki Manager. Not imported Final Fantasy templates yet, in case they need changing in any way, though most can just be copypasted.

I'm thinking we give it like a few weeks or so of a "transition" period to move content over, get it perfected on Bravely Default Wiki, and hopefully go through w:c:bravelydefault:Special:SpecialPages and resolve all/as many maintenance concerns as we can. Namely, I'd start with the WantedTemplates, create (or just copypaste) templates for all of these, and then go through WantedPages, add images, and finally fix any remaining links. The other thing would be creating pages for things like individual spells, which we don't have on BD for the time being.

I've given Hexedmagica and Some Color Mage bureaucrat rights on the wiki, as they agreed to it. I am now serving as the Wiki Manager there, and I'm sure they'll be happy to consider new staff members. In the meantime, we encourage people to edit Bravely Default content on the Bravely Default Wiki. We can consider this a "transition period". Once the wiki's in a good shape, i.e. no maintenance reports and good quality pages, we will begin the process of deleting Bravely Default content from the Final Fantasy Wiki, and replacing it with second-tier scope coverage. Thanks all, and let me know if you have any questions or need help!--Magicite-ffvi-ios Technobliterator (TC) 22:09, December 18, 2019 (UTC)