I was wondering if we have a policy regarding the "Allusions" subpages: I mean we have more or less consistent layout for the "Allusions", but sectioning keeps changing their names. Now to help you 'realise' of what I'm blabbering about...
But now a real hell starts:
And that is only to name the few: so what's your opinion? Standarise it or still keep it all in chaos? Is there an article you think is of an exceptional quality? Vote for it here! | |||
- I don't think there should be any sub-section of non-Final Fantasy allusions unless a particular game has an excessive number of allusions to some particular non-FF entity. They are just too varied and singular to justify a specific section for every little kind of non-FF allusion. Just Non-Final Fantasy Allusions is enough. Espritduo (talk) 20:36, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
Bump.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) 11:02, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
I don't see what the problem is. The content on the allusions subpages depends on what allusions the game has. FFVII has a bunch of music allusions, whereas other games have none, so it makes sense for FFVII to have a music allusions section while others don't.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 13:29, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
Have an "Other Square Enix projects" and then "Non-Square Enix related", divided, if necessary, into smaller categories. Like Kelt said, different games allude to different things. C A T U S E 17:41, May 31, 2013 (UTC)