Final Fantasy Wiki
Line 41: Line 41:
 
#Yep, it has my vote. Much better than the article I nominated. {{User:Jeppo/sig}} 21:48, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
#Yep, it has my vote. Much better than the article I nominated. {{User:Jeppo/sig}} 21:48, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I'd vote for Basch, but we have a character FA right now. So Omega it is. [[User:Moocowisi|Moocowisi]] 01:26, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
#I'd vote for Basch, but we have a character FA right now. So Omega it is. [[User:Moocowisi|Moocowisi]] 01:26, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
#Omega! --''[[User:Silver Mage|<span style="color:silver;">Silver</span>]] [[User talk:Silver Mage|<span style="color:royalblue;">Mage</span>]]'' [[User:Silver Mage/Lab|<span style="color:gray;">Ω</span>]] 06:22, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''[[Basch fon Ronsenburg]]''' - One of the best XII articles, lots of info (manga etc.) and good pictures, stats, details, very succinct, ''blah blah''. Basch lives! - [[User:Paramina|Paramina]] 13:42, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''[[Basch fon Ronsenburg]]''' - One of the best XII articles, lots of info (manga etc.) and good pictures, stats, details, very succinct, ''blah blah''. Basch lives! - [[User:Paramina|Paramina]] 13:42, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
#[[User:KujaRhapsodos|KujaRhapsodos]] 15:18, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
#[[User:KujaRhapsodos|KujaRhapsodos]] 15:18, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:22, 3 May 2010

Archive
Archives

Here's where you can nominate and vote on articles to be featured on the front page.

  • To nominate, simply write your nomination under the Nominees section and sign your posts. A nomination is equal to a vote, and it's one nomination per person.
  • To vote, simply sign with # ~~~~ under the nominees to symbolize your support. You can vote for as many as two nominees at a time. You can always change it at anytime, until the selection date.
  • Once a nominee is selected, we'll clear the nominees section to start a clear slate. You can nominate the same article again one month later. We call it a transition period.
  • You can give your Comments in the section below, but any claims of supporting a nominee does not count until you sign under the Nominees section. Take care!
  • Diablocon has the final say in things: he's in charge of the featured articles. Uweeheehee.
T4HoL-Kuore

June '10

  • Thunder - A very detailed article, tells you everything you need to know about the Thunder spell in each Final Fantasy game and has plenty of pictures if you are that way inclined. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 11:02, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • Cactuar I still don't understand why this article hasn't featured yet. A.X.A 12:19, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • Omega (Enemy) - comprehensive article with a lot of data for a parent page on the series' most famous superboss. Doreiku Kuroofangu 13:27, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  1. KujaRhapsodos 15:18, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Yep, it has my vote. Much better than the article I nominated. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 21:48, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I'd vote for Basch, but we have a character FA right now. So Omega it is. Moocowisi 01:26, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Omega! --Silver Mage Ω 06:22, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Basch fon Ronsenburg - One of the best XII articles, lots of info (manga etc.) and good pictures, stats, details, very succinct, blah blah. Basch lives! - Paramina 13:42, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  1. KujaRhapsodos 15:18, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • Shinryu - One the series' famous superbosses, the keeper of Ragnarok and Chaos' cheep summon for killing faster.  NeoZEROX Dissicon ff6 Ter4 16:08, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
  1. Shinryu is all-around badass, and I'm damn tired of character articles. MadHatter1284 21:22, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

@aXa: Probably because the article isn't very good. Just one look at the first paragraph and you can tell that it isn't well written. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 12:52, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

If i were you i would edit it to my liking so i can be pleased while reading it. if you saw any problem mate, edit it! A.X.A 13:59, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I've shortened the opening paragraph somewhat. The main problem was that the sentences that I just removed from that article was written in the second person, which unfortunately rears its ugly head in many articles, especially enemy articles. That is why I am always reluctant to vote for such articles and is probably also the reason why there are very few enemy articles that are featured. And I'm sorry to say this but the Kaiser Dragon article is reeking with second-person and instructive writing, which are two very big no-no's. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 15:09, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
Alright Jeppo, I took the initiative and fixed up Kaiser's page to the best of my ability, removing all instances of you (except in the strategy part, I have nothing to do with that.) Is it up to your standards now? SilverCrono 15:39, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
You're being a bit harsh, Crono. Those standards are understandable. You brings subjectivity, in a wiki where subjectivity doesn't have its place. KujaRhapsodos 15:41, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) The article strategy section was still instructive contained second-person writing so I've decided to fix it up so that it conforms to the MoS. The reason I didn't fix it at first (which I would have done) was because I never fought the boss and I was afraid that I may inadvertently change the strategy to something that wouldn't work or make sense. I still need somebody to reread the strategy and make sure it still makes sense. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 15:46, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
@Kuja- I know that. I never said anything about the standards being wrong and I never questioned them, I know you doesn't belong. That's why I removed it. And @Jeppo- I haven't fought him either, I just thought an enemy article would be great. That's why I didn't touch the strategy; I would rather the page look messy than it being wrong. SilverCrono 15:49, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
Actually, here's me criticising the writing and now after all that I've spotted something fundamentally wrong - its Hit Rate is unknown. Jeppo (Talk | contribs) 16:03, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

I read through an entire Revenant Wings script to fell out Basch's story in RW. A lot of work's been put into the article by a lot of people. - Paramina 13:42, May 1, 2010 (UTC) ETA: Sorry, but I really don't think the Shinryu article is up to FA standard. Yeah, Shinryu is awesome, accepted, but the article pales in comparison to say, the Omega article, which is a very similar article. Just sayin'.

Wait... Who deleted the Kaiser Dragon suggestion? What's going on here? SilverCrono 01:39, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Scathe did. You need 150 mainspace votes to nominate. Doreiku Kuroofangu 01:40, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
<facepalm>Please excuse my ignorance >_< SilverCrono 01:44, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Archive