Final Fantasy Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
(43 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
The '''Verifiability''' policy requires that all content in the [[Help:Namespaces|mainspace]] of the [[Project:About|''Final Fantasy'' Wiki]] be verifiable against reliable sources, referenced to by [[#Citing sources|inline citations]]. Editors and readers should be reasonably able to check the accuracy of a claim and trace its origin. Comprehensive verifiability standards help ensure the authority of the site and its usefulness as a resource, as well as resolve or avoid content disputes.
Cetain information on the Final Fantasy Wiki must be cited in order to clear up confusion or speculation. The Wiki uses a reference system that makes it easy to cite online sources. Further coverage of this topic may be found at [[Forum:Citations]].
 
   
  +
Verifiability mostly concerns exact claims or potentially contentious material that may be challenged by a reasonable, scrutinous reader. This policy does not require that even truistic content be attributed to a source; rather, that it be simply ''attributable'' to a reliable source. For example, facts gathered simply by playing the games normally are attributable to said games, but they do not need to be cited.
==What and When Should I Source?==
 
Not all data on the Wiki requires citations. Generally, if information is readily accessible through a game or has been stated explicitly by official [[Square Enix]] personnel or websites, it is accepted without references. However, when information is considered dubious, citations are preferred. Two common occasions where the reference system should be used are:
 
   
  +
==Procedure==
*When the data in question is from a game or publication that has not yet been released. Square Enix makes certain plot points available as the release date nears, and websites with these announcements should be cited or at least mentioned when respective information is added to the wiki. Please note that when information has been officially released and is no longer considered controversial, it does not need to be cited and any present references may be removed. This also applies to translations of a particular game; the release of the Japanese version does not confirm specific English translations.
 
  +
Unverifiable statements are liable to be removed at any time by any editor. However, be mindful of the difference between the ''unverifiable'' and the ''unverified''. Statements that may be attributable to an appropriate source but do not yet cite one should first be tagged with {{tl|citation needed}} for a [[Project:Conduct|courteous]] amount of time prior to removal.
   
  +
Ultimately, the burden of proof (that is, the responsibility to provide a source) lies with the editor making or wishing to keep the claim in question. When determining whether a provided source does in fact support the statement citing it, use the [[wikipedia:Sagan standard|Sagan standard]]: the weight of a claim requires at least the same as that of its evidence.
*When the storyline in a game is altered by an official outside source, such as a novel or interview. Changes from other games in a compilation or otherwise do not need to be cited.
 
   
  +
By the same token, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck—[[wikipedia:Duck test|it's a duck]]. Sources need not spell out a concept for it to be [[wikipedia:Common sense|common sense]]. As an encyclopedia, the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki admits, encourages, and even depends on original research. While we prohibit baseless speculation and [[wikipedia:Fan fiction|fan fiction]], the ideal article helps connect the dots (while still leaving room for the reader to draw their own conclusions).
   
  +
It is also important to [[Project:Conduct#Assume good faith|assume good faith]] when scrutinizing a claim against a provided source. In some cases, information may be supported by a source with restricted or difficult access (as with offline sources or copyrighted material). While the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki makes every attempt to make all appropriate resources freely available online, it also operates on the principle of good faith.
   
  +
==Reliable sources==
==Which Sources are Acceptable?==
 
  +
The most reliable sources are officially published Square material, and information readily accessed within the media (including that any research found through accessing the games' codes) is acceptable. Outside of this, reliable sources, official Square websites, respectable online gaming journalism sites (including ''[http://www.famitsu.com/game/news/1213478_1124.html Famitsu]'' and ''[http://www.ign.com/ IGN]''), statements from personnel involved (such as a developer, voice actor, or Square employee), and other press reviewing a Square Enix publication.
*Official Square websites. These are the most reliable references in the anticipation of a game's release.
 
*Respectable online gaming reviewers. Articles in this classification should be formally written and directly reference material revealed by Square Enix. Examples include ''[http://www.famitsu.com/game/news/1213478_1124.html Famitsu]'' and ''[http://www.ign.com/ IGN]''.
 
*When the information in question refers to a particular person, such as a voice actor, confirmation by that person in terms of an official website or announcement.
 
*Other press that reviews a Square Enix publication. This is most often sourced for reviews or effects on popular culture, for use in Trivia sections.
 
   
  +
Unacceptable sources include sites that can be edited by anyone (such as [[wikipedia:Main Page|Wikipedia]] or [http://www.imdb.com/IMDB IMDB]), online forums, or speculation websites. These are only valid as [[wikipedia:secondary source|secondary sources]]. Online stores are also unreliable for release dates, as they frequently use placeholder dates.
Sources that are NOT acceptable include, but are not limited to:
 
*Wikipedia, IMDB, or other similar sites that can be edited by anyone.
 
*Online forums or speculation websites.
 
   
  +
==Citing sources==
==How Do I Cite a Source?==
 
  +
Citations are created using footnotes, or bracketed superscript numbers or letters that are linked to a corresponding article for the cited material, or a full reference to the original source. Citations are placed inline within the body text, while references are listed in numerical or alphabetical order in a separate section at the bottom of the page.
Referencing an online source is quite simple, requiring only <nowiki><ref> and </ref></nowiki> tags, and either the [[Template:Reflist|Reflist template]] or <nowiki><references/></nowiki>, as well as the URL of the acceptable source.
 
   
  +
This is done automatically using the [[mw:Extension:Cite|cite extension]]. However, the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki uses and requires specialized implementations of the cite extension using [[:Category:Citation templates|citation templates]] (refer to the relevant documentation for instructions on how to use them).
For example, in order to sufficiently prove that Georgia Van Cuylenburg is the English voice actress for [[Oerba Dia Vanille]] in the absence of official Square confirmation and actual release of the English version of ''[[Final Fantasy XIII]]'', an external source of Miss Cuylenburg confirming her role in ''[[Final Fantasy XIII]]'' must be obtained.
 
   
  +
There are two important kinds of footnotes: [[Template:Cite|citations]], which are used to reference direct sources that support a claim, and [[Template:Note|annotations]], which explain incidental or tangential information to add context to a claim. [[Template:Ref|References]] are normally placed on the end of articles, but can be placed within the <code>[[mw:Extension:Cite|<nowiki><ref></nowiki>]]</code> tag to be used in inline citations.
The following URL links to a Youtube video that shows the voice actress confirming that she is Vanille's VA:
 
   
  +
All footnotes should be placed within close proximity to the claim they support, after all punctuation. They should be referred to under a "Citations" section (or "Notes" section with "Annotations" and "Citations" subsections, if both citations and annotations exist). Non-linked references should be listed in a subsequent "References" section (except in instances where only citations to a series release exist), with "Video games", "Websites", and "Bibliography" subsections (if necessary).
<nowiki>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsj27b65mUo</nowiki>
 
   
  +
Separating citations and references helps avoid repetition, and follows a standard encyclopedic format. This can be done if an article includes a large number of citations, especially to non-''Final Fantasy'' material which do not have articles, or if an article cites a source multiple times in different places. However, in cases where all citations point to ''Final Fantasy'' material and can link to an article, or very few citations are used on a page, it is unnecessary to separate.
Note that reliability is not based off of Youtube comments and speculation by faceless users, but by the visual and verbal proof of the actress herself. A mention of Vanille's VA may now be made on her article. The phrase or paragraph making this assertion must be immediately followed up with the URL of the source, encased in <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tags.
 
   
  +
==See also==
I.e., a simple statement would read:
 
  +
* [[Help:Cite]], for a basic introduction to the cite extension.
  +
* [[mw:Extension:Cite|Extension:Cite]], for the full cite extension documentation.
  +
* [[:Category:Citation templates]], for all templates related to footnotes on the wiki.
   
  +
{{navbox policies and guidelines}}
<nowiki>Georgia Van Cuylenburg is Oerba Dia Vanille's English voice actress.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsj27b65mUo</ref></nowiki>
 
  +
[[Category:Policies and guidelines]]
 
Georgia Van Cuylenburg is Oerba Dia Vanille's English voice actress.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsj27b65mUo</ref>
 
 
Multiple references throughout an article can be made in this way. At the end of an article, before organizational and stub templates, place the <nowiki><references/></nowiki> tag or [[Template:Reflist|reflist template]] underneath a section entitled "References", which then organizes the cited sources automatically:
 
 
<references/>
 
 
Upon the English release of ''Final Fantasy XIII'', Miss Cuylenburg's part in the game would be confirmed, and such a citation could be removed.
 
 
[[Category: Final Fantasy Wiki|C]]
 

Revision as of 19:52, 22 March 2020

The Verifiability policy requires that all content in the mainspace of the Final Fantasy Wiki be verifiable against reliable sources, referenced to by inline citations. Editors and readers should be reasonably able to check the accuracy of a claim and trace its origin. Comprehensive verifiability standards help ensure the authority of the site and its usefulness as a resource, as well as resolve or avoid content disputes.

Verifiability mostly concerns exact claims or potentially contentious material that may be challenged by a reasonable, scrutinous reader. This policy does not require that even truistic content be attributed to a source; rather, that it be simply attributable to a reliable source. For example, facts gathered simply by playing the games normally are attributable to said games, but they do not need to be cited.

Procedure

Unverifiable statements are liable to be removed at any time by any editor. However, be mindful of the difference between the unverifiable and the unverified. Statements that may be attributable to an appropriate source but do not yet cite one should first be tagged with {{citation needed}} for a courteous amount of time prior to removal.

Ultimately, the burden of proof (that is, the responsibility to provide a source) lies with the editor making or wishing to keep the claim in question. When determining whether a provided source does in fact support the statement citing it, use the Sagan standard: the weight of a claim requires at least the same as that of its evidence.

By the same token, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck—it's a duck. Sources need not spell out a concept for it to be common sense. As an encyclopedia, the Final Fantasy Wiki admits, encourages, and even depends on original research. While we prohibit baseless speculation and fan fiction, the ideal article helps connect the dots (while still leaving room for the reader to draw their own conclusions).

It is also important to assume good faith when scrutinizing a claim against a provided source. In some cases, information may be supported by a source with restricted or difficult access (as with offline sources or copyrighted material). While the Final Fantasy Wiki makes every attempt to make all appropriate resources freely available online, it also operates on the principle of good faith.

Reliable sources

The most reliable sources are officially published Square material, and information readily accessed within the media (including that any research found through accessing the games' codes) is acceptable. Outside of this, reliable sources, official Square websites, respectable online gaming journalism sites (including Famitsu and IGN), statements from personnel involved (such as a developer, voice actor, or Square employee), and other press reviewing a Square Enix publication.

Unacceptable sources include sites that can be edited by anyone (such as Wikipedia or IMDB), online forums, or speculation websites. These are only valid as secondary sources. Online stores are also unreliable for release dates, as they frequently use placeholder dates.

Citing sources

Citations are created using footnotes, or bracketed superscript numbers or letters that are linked to a corresponding article for the cited material, or a full reference to the original source. Citations are placed inline within the body text, while references are listed in numerical or alphabetical order in a separate section at the bottom of the page.

This is done automatically using the cite extension. However, the Final Fantasy Wiki uses and requires specialized implementations of the cite extension using citation templates (refer to the relevant documentation for instructions on how to use them).

There are two important kinds of footnotes: citations, which are used to reference direct sources that support a claim, and annotations, which explain incidental or tangential information to add context to a claim. References are normally placed on the end of articles, but can be placed within the <ref> tag to be used in inline citations.

All footnotes should be placed within close proximity to the claim they support, after all punctuation. They should be referred to under a "Citations" section (or "Notes" section with "Annotations" and "Citations" subsections, if both citations and annotations exist). Non-linked references should be listed in a subsequent "References" section (except in instances where only citations to a series release exist), with "Video games", "Websites", and "Bibliography" subsections (if necessary).

Separating citations and references helps avoid repetition, and follows a standard encyclopedic format. This can be done if an article includes a large number of citations, especially to non-Final Fantasy material which do not have articles, or if an article cites a source multiple times in different places. However, in cases where all citations point to Final Fantasy material and can link to an article, or very few citations are used on a page, it is unnecessary to separate.

See also