Final Fantasy Wiki
Line 180: Line 180:
 
:::Yes and my idea is Red versus the Mogster. That's my idea, so its awesome too.... [[User:TheBlueDragoon|TheBlueDragoon]] 06:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Yes and my idea is Red versus the Mogster. That's my idea, so its awesome too.... [[User:TheBlueDragoon|TheBlueDragoon]] 06:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 
I don't mean to offend anyone, but, Barret mostly looks badass, he is a kind hearted person inside. But, because the story of FF8 touched me a lot more than FF7, I have to go for Irvine. Remind me if Barret was ever so badass. It's been some time since the last time I played FF7. [[User:FinalAnnihilator|FinalAnnihilator]] 09:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 
I don't mean to offend anyone, but, Barret mostly looks badass, he is a kind hearted person inside. But, because the story of FF8 touched me a lot more than FF7, I have to go for Irvine. Remind me if Barret was ever so badass. It's been some time since the last time I played FF7. [[User:FinalAnnihilator|FinalAnnihilator]] 09:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  +
Personality wise, Irvine is like Proto-Balthier. Which is win. --[[User:Adonzo|Adonzo]] 09:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 
<!-- DO NOT ADD COMMENTS OR EDIT ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!!! -->
 
<!-- DO NOT ADD COMMENTS OR EDIT ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!!! -->
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 09:42, 5 June 2009

DNC Logo Idear


Uwee hee hee hee! Welcome, editors, to the Dragon's Neck Colosseum! My name is Ultros the receptionist, and each week I'm taking bets as to who will win in a tussle between two characters from the Final Fantasy series! The winner gets, well, nothing. It's more of a poll, really. The Colosseum owner stuck me on this duty after Kefka was defeated, but I need the money! So what are you waiting for? Get voting! Remember, you can remain anonymous! If you have any requests for future fights, please feel free to leave a message here.

The Rules, Briefly

Functionally, this is a popularity contest. You may vote for your favorite or who you think would win in an competition between the two combatants that week.

  • You may vote only once.
  • If you are a user, please include your vote in the user section.
  • If you are not a user, please include your vote in the anonymous section.
  • To vote, leave the following "#~~~~" and you are required to leave this whether you are logged in or anonymous.
  • If you wish to comment on the fight, please leave your remarks in the peanut gallery. You are expected to conduct yourself with courtesy. Comments must relate to the fight at hand.
  • Do not alter the format of this page.

Any failure to adhere to these rules will result in your vote(s) being removed. Ties may be called if the victor won by a margin of 10% or less.

Week 121: Irvine v. Barret

CharVIII Irvine
Dnc v
WINNER!
Undecided
Not every explanation is profound. These are gunners. One is from FFVIII and one is from FFVII, because thats all anyone wants to vote on!

Votes for Irvine

  1. Irvine's a cool dude. He's best AND the most orthodox Gunner in the series quite awesome to see. No stupid gimmicks just a Stetson hat, shooting and awesome "Shots", backed with a good personality. He has one low(plot relevant)moment and everyone deems him pure garbage. Only real bad thing about him is he doesn't get too much development but that's VIII's fault. Of course I give respect to Barret easily one of the better characters in VII. AnonyMan
  2. My suggestion again! Let's see...Irvine is younger, sexier, more refined, a greater marksman, a more dashing gentleman, better dressed, uses superior guns, has better limit breaks, is more cautious and level-headed, has both of his hands, and is just as willing as Barret to fight for what he believes in. What does Barret have over Irvine? More relevance to the plot, but that's about it. Of course, some will argue that that's what ultimately more important, and I'd normally agree, but when you look at the tale of the tape, Irvine has the advantage. Oh, and cowboys rock. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 03:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  3. Well... I like Barret but Irvine made it to my final party. Terra_Homing 03:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  4. Firstly, Irvine is %100 human. No robotic hand/gun-for-a-hand or anything. He also doesn't add "$%^&*" to every conversation. Plus, he looks and acts coolers.--JohnnyC 03:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  5. Faethinverba volant loves guns and women too. Well, women anyway.
  6. User:Murmilo I used Irvine more in FF8 then Barret in FF7
  7. I kinda liked FF8 a lot more than 7 so... FinalAnnihilator 12:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  8. I ended up not using either in my final party but I kind of liked Irvine a little more than Barret.--Werefang 12:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  9. Two words- 'Cowboy' and 'Hat'. He also managed the unusual feat of not annoying me AT ALL throughout the whole game, which every other character managed to do during FFVIII. Although I liked him in FFVII, I don't see Barret wearing a cowboy hat, so my vote goes on clothing style. Captain Darkblade 13:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  10. Dag! This is the hardest vote for me yet because both were valuable assests to my attack party. Despite that, i'm going to have to go with Irvine on this one. I have a thing for shotguns...when they are used in movies and/or on video games...the use of it just makes my day and happy to be a man! Irvine is one of my favorite all time FF characters to use in battles though Barrert had a much larger role in his game's plot. Heretic Ramza
  11. I loved Irvine. He was one of my favorite characters in VIII, Barret was cool but Irvine was cooler. Irvine forever!Soren 4ever 14:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  12. To me it's difficult... They both can cast magic and summon... The main difference it's their limits break, and I think Irvine's is better!!! Josep
  13. Munk451 Irvine was so awesome, especially at the ending.
  14. As i hate guys who get all the girls, that was a point of Irvine for me. But i hated A-team and Rocky III. Plus Barret had no 'connection' to me, he wasn't real enough i guess. Irvine looks and acts like someone i know, so he was kinda believable. also Irvine didn't date Cloud, he went for Quistis, Rinoa, and Selphie. Limit is better too.
  15. These are both very likable characters to me, but Irvine gets my vote for being so damn hot. Sorry for being superficial. :P SamSandy 19:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  16. I'm not personally fond of either characters' personalities. Irvine seems tacked on to the plot, and Barret was translated to be a Mr. T knock-off. However, I did take Irvine to the final battle because of his useful Limit Break.
  17. Free bird 01:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC): Barret has some of the coolest limits in FFVII, but I prefer Irvine.
  18. ClixPsi
  19. I like Irvine, he was so laid back, and he's a sniper too, but he also had personal confidence issues and he was the first to realize that the group were all in Edea's orphanage together BritBoy 02:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  20. I always found Barret a tad bit annoying. Besides, Irvine's one of the strongest members of my party. LadyLeonhart 09:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  21. Brokeback Mountain, OMG. :D Template:BfDsig
  22. I kind of like people with a laid back personality, mainly because you can relate with them a lot easier. I'd pick Irvine over the guy with an obsession for hot dogs any day. Xxwater blue pandaxX
  23. Voting for the underdog again. He's cool, he has a cool hat, and he actually tried to kill the villian rather than let them talk away :| Aside from his importance to the plot, he has everthing over the overrated Mr. T/Cyborg clone. Gyromite 05:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  24. GO IRVINE!! i found barret useles and never used him, irvine however i usedd all the time. and lets face it the real gunner of ff 7 is and always will be Vincent Valintine, if it was him agianst Irvine then we have a fight on our hands. Also IRVINE HAS A COWBUY HAT!!!lordflare 22:38, 4 june 2009 (UTC)
  25. I vote Irvine because he's calm, he's good looking AND he wears a cowboy hat, how more awesome can you get? =D - Sencilia
  26. For the ladies man, the sharpshooter, and the awesome coat. 1stclasswarrior 14:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  27. I'll vote for Irvine, because I'll vote for Irvine, 'nuff said... DB36
  28. stetson and shotguns > mr. t and gunarms. also, irvine, zell and squall were my best characters in FFVIII (i have no patience for mages) --Adonzo 09:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Anonymous Votes

  1. Irvine could snipe barret out before he could into range. 206.248.109.31 14:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  2. The only reason Irvine chickened out and didn't shoot Edea was because he remembered their past. Besides, he kicked ass in the Desert Prison. Barret? I liked his weapon but that's about it. 121.223.158.73 07:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  3. Irvine would be able to take the fight at a greater range than Barrett. Plus with a more flexible limit break with AP Shot, GF and para-magic Barrett would have run out of MP before Irvine would run out of magic, and junctions make you more powerful, while loading yourself down with materia is a punishable thing by the combat system's rules. With less detriments and more range, I would have to give it to Irvine Kinneas.

Votes for Barret

  1. First vote! Barret has more backstory and uses trains as metaphors. Cluna 06 01:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  2. If I wasn't voting in favor of Barret, first vote! Regardless, the Heavy Vulcan is one of my favorite ranged weapons; Barret gets one of the coolest Limit Breaks (Satellite Beam;) is a character from VII, gets the Enemy Launcher (which is only not a RYNO-ripoff because Ratchet and Clank came out after FFVII; I still call that thing the RYNO anyway...) and repeatedly makes fun of Cloud's "spikey head." The.DreadnoughT 02:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  3. BlueHighwind : #$%%!
  4. Mr. T? 'Tis you!ロル Lol Cakes オケス 03:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  5. I pity the fool who doesn't vote for Barret. Who doesn't like Barret? TheBlueDragoon 02:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  6. Nokareon- There ain't no gettin' offa' this train we're on! No, but seriously, Barret broke stereotypes and covered new ground in Japanese video game character history, while Irvine merely reinforced the stereotypes. I can show you a dozen of other characters like Irvine- not so with Barret.
  7. Barret's just unique. I don't appreciate that much the Advent Children character, but the FFVII one is definitely one of a kind NeoSeth 09:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  8. He had a freaking gun...on HIS ARM!!!!!!!NeoExdeath 09:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  9. I'm voting for Mr. T over Clint Eastwood. Jeppo (Talk) 09:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  10. Kuzlalala Squee! 10:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  11. This one doesnt need guns to beat the crap out of the other contender. Leon5550 10:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  12. ScatheMote 10:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  13. 1 im a vii freak 2 im loosely basing a character in a story im writing off him and 3 without guns or gunarms barret would kick the shite out of irvinethe 6th angel
  14. Irvine? Hahahahaha DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH! Violetmage
  15. I hate both characters but Barret isn't a "ladies man" I hate those types of guys. BoAKaNRikkusmallsig 16:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  16. Because vote #9 deserves this vote. And because I like Barret's style. Karu
  17.  NeoZEROX Dissicon ff6 Ter4 17:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  18. MMLN メーマウリアン 17:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Although Irvine is my 2nd favourite support character ever, I do not like his personality as much as Barret's :P
  19. I like both, but Barret is more fun, "cute" with her daughter and has a background story more complex than "i'm just a orphan". And Barret is always $&#"&! around, and that made him more "human". Also, the Casanova stereotype and the bishonen physic are overused. And well, Barret reminds me the protagonist of an epic poop. Sorry Irvine, my vote goes to the big unshaven guy. Rai Balmung, the gargoyle 18:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  20. $%#&! Barret gets my hi'five. The guy who said the rotten pizza sentence must win. Also, I don't know Irvine for more than two sentences and thus, Barret wins. Also, I like his backstory and Dyne's death was the most emotivestest part of FFVII evah. Go to heck, you flower girl.Zak Undersn 18:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  21. Barret is more interesting by far than Irvine, has way better Limit Breaks, has far more interesting lines in VII than Irvine does in VIII, and is more involved in the story – Irvine attempts the assassination, then does bugger all else. Oh, and the fact that I'm prejudiced against VIII's contrived character backstory. Plus, Irvine likes Selphie, which instantly earns him several antirespect points from me -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 18:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  22. Why? Because he can punch your lights out and shoot a hole through your brain, that's why. MechaUltimaZero 19:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  23. I just don't like Irvine. - Henryacores^ 21:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  24. Irvine is just a pretty-boy, while Barret is a badass with a machine gun for a hand. Why wouldn't I vote for him? - Ninja of Wind Ninja of Wind2- 22:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  25. He hates people who sleeps in boxes... Well... Barret has nice limit breaks...OnionKnight23
  26. Barret is far more usefull and far more baddass, He is almosted NEEDED for fights where short range melee woun't work. Like the Helecopter at Shinra tower. Not to mention he may look all tough, but has a soft heart when it comes to people he cares about (Marleen). User:Neosamuel
  27. Barret is beast mode and can destroy any fag with a cowboy hat. User:+onionknight+
  28. The ladies man, or the man with the mouth like a sailor? Well, it's not Cid, but Barret is the better choice here. Besides, he looks like Mr. T. That's a win right there. Yath 13:39 (1:39 PM) 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  29. This isn't exactly fair, because I don't know who Irvine is, & I don't care enough to find out more, but I'm going to vote for Barret, regardless.Neo Bahamut 02:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  30. BlueLionheart Cloudy Wolf (T/C) 03:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Anonymous Votes

  1. Barret is just a badass, plain and simple. Just looking at him you know he's not one you want to cross, but he's also got a soft side as seen in the case of Marlene. He also makes fun of Cloud, which is just a bonus. Plus, he's got a freaking gun for an arm. That just screams badass. No offense to Irvine, but just like every character in VIII he had no development, so there's not much to vote on there. Not his fault, but still 71.187.79.22 02:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  2. I love Barret's personality and he made me laugh pretty often69.108.107.247
  3. Best limit breaks clearly, plus his gun is grafted onto his arm! his arm! and he is a dad trying to save the world and it's his fault we joined avalanche and became embroiled in FFVII to start with. 89.240.137.70 09:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  4. Barret Wallace: the stoneheaded Hearth of AVALANCHE. Irvine? The only sniper who cries before shooting. And failing, too.
  5. I pity the fool who votes for Irvine!
  6. Irvine is in VIII and a whiny useless piece of shit. Barret is in VII and funny as hell.
  7. Barret is better than Irvine because he's way funnier and sterotypical than him.

76.234.96.44 02:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

  1. Barret can fire a satellite laser beam as a limit break. I like to see cowboy do something like that.

Peanut Gallery

Because this seems to be needed as a reminder to all of us who seem terribly incapable of following the rules of simple exercises in the democratic process, here's the reminder in advance: SIGN YOUR DAMN VOTES! While editing, your vote should look something like this example:
#This is an example of a signed (and therefore correct) anonymous vote that will actually count, rather than wasting your time. ~~~~

When you click Preview, it looks something like

  1. This is an example of a signed (and therefore correct) anonymous vote that will actually count, rather than wasting your time. 1.2.3.4

So now that you have two examples of how to do it, GO SIGN YOUR DAMN VOTES (then sit down and drink your goddamned tea!), you anonymous people! (And the rest of us, too, for <insert name of deity here>'s sake!) The.DreadnoughT 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey! It seems to have worked! Only two of the anonymous votes aren't signed now!

Next time, wait before deleting other's votes. They can return, discover that they were logged out when they signed their votes and repair them. But not if someone (who generally isn't an admin) deleted them. Rai Balmung, the gargoyle 18:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

As awesome as the tried to play Irvine's marksmanship out to be, why the hell does Squall of all people have not only a better Accuracy stat but a MAXED one at that? Either Squall(and Seifer) are naturally superhuman or gaining proficiency in unorthodox and highly impractical weapons will do that to you. AnonyMan 02:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh joy, yet another fight I don't care about. I wish one of my ideas would make it into the DNC. I mean there are so many other fights that would be better. I really want to see Red versus Mog. TheBlueDragoon 02:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, quit your bitching and moaning. What other fights you think would be better is your opinion. This fight isn't going to be repealed, so save your breath. And for the record, do you know how long I had to wait to get one of my suggestions up here? Once you think of a half-decent suggestion, then maybe it might get picked. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 03:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I don't know how long you had to wait. Yet still, it is a good fight, just not one I wanted to see. I refuse to say anything further. TheBlueDragoon 03:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Nokareon- is it just me, or does it seem like each fight is staying up longer than a week? Maybe it's just 'cause the recent ones have been so boring...

Mon Dieu, I'm generally having a dilemma here. I couldn't possibly pick between these two and yet... I must show my support for them! Ah, this is horrible! I'll abstain for just now... I've got some serious thinking to do. Paramina 08:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Same here, I can't decide easily between them, I liked them both and disliked very few things of them. And both of them are being accused of things that aren't really correct by the anons like Barret saying "!@#$%" at every opportunity he gets, as far as I remember compared with Cid in the same game Barret's pretty well mannered with his mouth. Or Irvine "crying" before shooting, really all those who like to throw that at his face should stop and consider if they could shoot the woman that raised them without having a breakdown. I suppose I'll wait and vote for the one with less votes if I can't decide after a couple of days. Celythia
"Crying?" Am I really that bad? Am I the only person to miss the "boo-hoo"s and "snifle"s?</sarcasm> And "raised them" nothing. Snipers are professional murderers. First they need to study their target and get to know them. Then they need to figure out the best time to take the shoot. And then, they need to watch their victim die. Most soldiers kill in the heat of the moment. Snipers kill in cold blood. The fact that he could take the shot at all is amazing.--Werefang 16:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For the record in my version of the game (and probably all the Spanish versions) all Irvine does is say "aah... ah... aaaaaah..." and point to the side to Squall, as if to say "Don't you see WHO it is?" Celythiaput
I'm not saying that he doesn't recognizer her. It may very well be the proverbial "straw that broke the camel's back." I'm simply pointing out that the assumption that every sniper is an automatic "badass" who can take a life without a second thought is, at best, missguided, and at median (yes, median), complete and utter ignorance. Don't ask me what the worst is. The answer would cause you to go blind.--Werefang 00:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Wait a second. Rewind a bit. We don't know if Barret is actually less foul-mouthed than Cid, because Cid got to use real f***ing curses once in a while. His favorite seems to be "Shit! Shit! Shit!"; Barret seems to swear somewhat less often, but presumably Square decided that whatever Barret was saying was bad enough to be f%$#ing blanked out. In other words, Barret may have been dropping F-bombs, which are significantly more profane than Cid's "Shit!" shit. Not that I give a damned shit in Hell's sewers, I'm just pointing that out. The.DreadnoughT 00:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't surprise me how there's a ton of Mr. T jokes. I pity the fool who doesn't vote in this week's fight. TheBlueDragoon 21:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I pity the fool who votes and doesn't sign. The.DreadnoughT 00:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
They do need to sign their votes, or they're just wasting their time. TheBlueDragoon 21:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

If you don't vote for Barret, he'll "go upside your spikey white head and bring you back to normal!" This is a good example of what I meant in my vote when I said Barret has great lines -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 22:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Barret did have some good lines, although I don't remember many of them. I haven't played FFVII in about five years. TheBlueDragoon 22:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Irvine is so cool he gets two lists of vote~s ^0^ (I wanna fix it but I'm afraid of breaking something and don't even know if it would be alright to do it). Celythia


Notice Square are fine with black men leads but no black women ¬_¬ 78.144.163.68 09:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Not this discussion again... Remember Fran? Take of the bunny ears and you've got yourself a "sister". SamSandy 19:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I think we need to do something about the cowboy hat. People are using it as grounds for voting against Barret, which is an extremely flimsy excuse – the only thing flimsier is claiming that Irvine's limits are better... get real, people!. I propose replacing Barret's portrait at the top with this picture to even things up -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 15:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I suggest that BOTH portraits are replaced with that picture, because voting for a character "because he's Mr.T" doesn't have more ground than "has a cowboy hat". That way both of them will have cowboy's hats AND be Mr.T. Celythia
Uh, this is the DNC. People can vote here using whatever reason they can come up with. So what if Irvine has a hat? Makes no difference. I could vote for Irvine because he had nicer shoes. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 16:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
That's preposterous! Everyone knows Barret has nicer shoes. XP Master Conjurer 02:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

God whats with all these terrible matchups? Again not voting. - Saraija Merinas "That's all people want to vote for!" I disagree highly. There are several fights with a lot of votes in the DNC, although I will say that the one I'm supporting has an FFVII character. But also an FFIX one! But really, I don't know the situation with VIII, but it's really a disadvantage to propose a fight with a VII character.Neo Bahamut 02:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

If you dun like it, bitching about it won't help. And PS, this matchup is awesome cause it's mine. Insult it and you're insulting me. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 03:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Learn to read. Or at least don't put words in my mouth.Neo Bahamut 03:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes and my idea is Red versus the Mogster. That's my idea, so its awesome too.... TheBlueDragoon 06:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't mean to offend anyone, but, Barret mostly looks badass, he is a kind hearted person inside. But, because the story of FF8 touched me a lot more than FF7, I have to go for Irvine. Remind me if Barret was ever so badass. It's been some time since the last time I played FF7. FinalAnnihilator 09:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Personality wise, Irvine is like Proto-Balthier. Which is win. --Adonzo 09:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Week 120: Amarant Coral v. Kimahri Ronso

Dnc v
WINNER!
Amarant
33½ to 29½
As I have been told, this is supposed to be the courageous lion versus the lone wolf, but certainly, you, having played the game could probably draw other parallels.

Votes for Amarant

  1. Unfortunately for me, I missed out on getting Vivi his best spells, so I had to bench the little guy. Meanwhile, I also missed out on Steiner's best weapons, so he was also lacking. Thus, Amarant actually made it into my final party, along side Eiko and Freya. Thanks to Counter Magic and several other useful skills, Amarant proved to be a good substitution. Hey, it's more useful than Kimarhi, who just feels like a second-rate copy of whosoever path you send him down. ...Neither were too interesting as story characters. ClixPsi
  2. I felt Amarant was useful while Kimahri just wasn't. Amarant meant I could go spell crazy as long as he was there due to chakra. Kimahri however made me trade him out for one of the girls apart form that one battle where I spammed attack to kill the bosses. Sorceress Heartilly
  3. BlueHighwind : How can I vote against the Dude?
  4. Neither of them made it to my final party, but although I still look at Amarant and feel that story-wise he lacked many things (although Quina lacked even more things so I won't complain much) he was in my party pretty often and was in fact my second backup with Steiner. Kimahri on the other hand won my heart story-wise but lost it all in the gameplay aspect so I neglected him in the worst way you can imagine and only came to level him up when he had to fight alone. They're pretty equal but still the fact that I liked Amarant story-wise (despite finding it lacking) and gameplay wise makes me vote for him. And I always liked wolfs over lions, specially lions with a broken horn. Celythia
  5. Two characters I didn't really care for. I'm only going with Amarant because he didn't feel like a copy. He had his own, if somewhat pointless, abilities. Plus he could Throw, which is always a plus in my book.TheBlueDragoon 18:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Wow, I think this is the earliest I've ever gotten to this after a change. Anyway, how could I vote for a semi-Blue Mage? Blue Magic is one of those things...I'm not even sure I'd vote for a Blue Mage against the Whiny Dumbshit from VI. And then Amarant has to go and be similar (in some ways, if not all) to Solid Snake. Snake Relative vs Blue Mage + Dragoon...Amarant gets my vote. The.DreadnoughT 20:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. Unlike some people, I have nothing against Kimahri, but he has the same fatal flaw that Quistis does: Blue Magic should never be restricted to a Limit Break. Amarant is more interesting character-wise (though not story-wise), and he's often quoted as a useful party member for challenging Ozma, which earns him bonus points in my book :P -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 21:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. Kimahri can go down any path on the Sphere Grid but ultimately he's just a weaker version of the original, who needs a sub-par black mage with Lulu or a Healer who can't summon? Also, No Mercy can do 9999 by the end of FFIX. Terra_Homing 21:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. OH HOLY SHIN-RA CORP. I must vote for you, Salamander Coral. Not that I hate Kimahri (in fact he's so irrelevant to the story that I almost actually liked him) though, but The Man here can put autolife to all your party at once and then throw things to your enemies to death, or kill them to death, or quad-9 them to death, or heal your party's MP until your enemy gets bored and dies. The only thing that makes Kimahri "unique" on it's own game is that he has one of the most awesomesest skills ever limited to his limit breaks. ALL HAIL AMARANT. Zak Undersn 21:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. I like Kimahri, he's one of the only good characters in X's massive suck of a Cast. But the big Red-Hair is in another league. Sure he may not have too much prominence in the story(like Kimahri). But he's got character, the look and awesome versatile abilities, NO MERCY! Of all of FF's supercilius "bad-ass" characters he's like the only one who actually is, and more so than the others. AnonyMan
  11. Hey it's FFIX's team mascot! - ロル Lol Cakes オケス 00:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. Nokareon: Amarant has cooler personality, and can actually hit 9999, making him not useless like Kimahri.
  13. Meh. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 05:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Kimahri is a useless Blue Mage *and* Dragoon. Meanwhile Amarant may be my least favorite IX party member, but he is damn useful as a battery for my mages. Hyacynth
  15. Amarant AND kihamari did little for their respective games. But being a bigger IX fan and knowing that Amarant a bit more skill fighting (he's a monk so he's good with hand-to-hand and he's a ninja so he throws too) makes him more useful the his opponent. He did have NO story in the game though.--Jedicam10 07:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  16. MMLN メーマウリアン With Kimahri being my least favourite character in FFX (despite being sort of Blue Mage) my vote is clear on this one, although Amarant is not one of my favourites aswell :P
  17. Come, on, people, Amarant is way cooler than Kimahri (who is also very cool) and he is also useful in battle, something than Kimahri is not. --TenzaZangetsu 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  18. Heretic Ramza Kimahri is cooler looking (like something off the Thundercats) but he was a huge let down for me, especially as the only non human party member. Neither were a whole lot useful for me in battles or added much to their games' plot, but Amarant seemed more powerful and dynamic since he starts off playing for the other team.
  19. His hairstyle rocks. Karu
  20. Kimahri was my third main party member in FFX, because I like his appearance and he had Jump. I though he was a Dragoon, and without doubt choose him for my party. When I discovered he had to choose another character's path, I though "Wow, now I can have a cooler black mage than Lulu". It took me many time to understand he was a poor imitation, a "second-rate" copy of another character as someone told before me. And I was against Jecht then. Really, I never had Amarant in my party in FFIX. I always took Zidane, Garnet, Vivi and Steiner, and sometimes Eiko, Freya or Quina. But never Amarant, so I can't evaluate his skills in battle. In spite of that, is really HARD, if not impossible, be more useless than Kimahri, and I like Amarant's looking too. Besides, I consider a MNK/NIN (Monk+Ninja) a more "natural" combination of jobs. A DRG/BLU is a great idea, but in Kimahri's case is a failureDragoon+failureBlue Mage, so MNK/NIN win by far. In plot terms, Kimahri win, basically because I don't remember a thing of Amarant, and reading here I understand why. Both characters have things for voting them, and things for voting against them, but Kimahri had more against than Amarant. Rai Balmung, the gargoyle 15:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  21. Somewhat useful char vs. Kimahri. Easy to choose. Kupuntu 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  22. I didn't really like either of them, but you've got to admit that Amarant is more useful. Kimahri's talk about "Kimahri not big strong Ronso Warrior" made me want to douse my television in gasoline. Violetmage
  23. I think Kimari is a good character in the plot, but less important in battle: his attack power is not so powerful as Tidus's or Auron's and his Skill are not so useful as Magic or others... Anyway it's a good choice but not the best I think, his skills are not the best and his Turbo is not so useful... I think Amarant, although it's not my choice in my perfect party, it's better: his physical attacks are strong, but not stronger enough as Steiner or Zidane, anyway, it's a underestimate choice and his skills are useful, I vote for Amarant but doubting... Josep
  24. Two words: Ninja-Monk. More words: A monk that acts like a ninja, Or a Blue mage that tries to act like a Dragoon, whose Blue Magic only works when he's in overdrive? Amarant is way better than Kimahri in that respect... Yath 13:43 (1:43 PM), 27 May 2009 ~
  25. he is just gr8 better than kimhari anyday lol
  26. Why didn't someone tell me that my suggestion made it? Eh, I wouldn't have listened anyway, I have been way too busy. And anyway, the fight is supposed to be about how both of them have two class types that no one can figure out if they are one or the other. Amarant is a Ninja and Monk(which is why I am voting for him) and Kimari is a Dragoon and Blue Mage(a close second in class types). It is also interesting because both of these characters have been shoved into the background by characters whose rolls in the plot run much deeper and have more meaning. - Ninja of Wind Ninja of Wind2- 23:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  27. In my book, wolves top lions. Now on to the fight. I think Amarant has more usefulness than Kimahri. Also, he basically just punches the crap out of things, and when not punching, he's using some Flair move. Enough said in my opinion. Majyk 01:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  28. I don't like either of them but I prefer IX over X, so my vote goes to Amarant. --StragusLore 02:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  29. I'm sorry, Dragoons, but I'll have to let you down.Xepscern Highwind
  30. Amarant has the best Trance and Kimahrit -- ergh. George B. (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  31. Counter Magic+No Mercy+Curse+Throw= One of the best and effective IX Characters. He was good with magic AND physicals, and if memory serves me correctly, he could restore MP Captain Darkblade
  32. Kimahri wasn't that useful in 10, so im voting for the useful one User:Murmilo

Anonymous Votes

  1. Elan + Aura + 50 spirit = invincibility71.247.251.194 23:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. I think i remember actually using Amarant for slightly more than the fights that you're required to use him in, which is more than i can say for Kimahri. As characters, they do almost nothing for the story, though Amarant does slightly more. 76.234.96.44 23:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. I love Amarant, his skills are amazingly useful and he always ends up in my final roster. I just wish he had more substance to the story. Also he has a kickass theme, red dreads and the pointiest chin in FF history. 86.8.60.61

Votes for Kimahri

  1. ScatheMote 15:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Phantom-Knight Amarant's character development is really minute. His impact on the game in the story side is really not that moving.. and the way his character was made was really lame cuz there really was no sentimental connection to the game whatsoever.. unlike Kimahri where the game gave the spotlight to him and his value to the team both in the story side and in the grinding part is really great.. aside from the chakra skill of Amarant which i really loved Kimahri overshadows the redhaired dude.. sorry bro.. go Tarzan i mean Kimahri!
  3. I've just started IX, so my vote goes to the game I have already played, X. Go go Kimahri! The Final Annihilator
  4. I have more sympathy for Kimahri than Amarant. At first, Kimahri comes off as the silent giant powerhouse of the group, but as the game advances, he's actually a quite pathetic outcast among his kind, which was honestly surprising. I don't have anything to say about his battle skills, though. SamSandy 19:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. I despise Amarant, I think his character is horrible and I never liked using him. Kimahri doesn't talk much but he is a good character. He is an honorable, caring character who will put his life on the line to save anyone. Amarant on the other hand only cares about himself, pfft. Go Kimahri! :) BoAKaNRikkusmallsig 21:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Amarant is completely hallow and lacking of character. Seriously, I'm voting against my favorite game, and for my most hated? That's saying something. Template:BfDsig
  7. The person above me means "hollow." "Hallow" means "holy." In any case, I don't really care about either of them. But, since I know something about Kimahri, & I can't even tell what Amarant IS, I'm voting for the Ronso.Neo Bahamut 22:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. I'm voting for the guy you can put in any job class! Cluna 06 02:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. I'm surprised that I'm actually voting for a X character versus a IX character... especially since the character is Kimarhi... But, you see, I don't like Amarant. When you see him standing next to his castmates in IX, he's just not that great (in comparison). I actually like Kimarhi... when I think about it ahah. I really like his relationship with Yuna, and the fact that he's just a good guy with good morals. So, I'm siding with Kimarhi on this one Yzz 03:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. Ehh, Amarant didn't really seem very significant in the plotline to me. Khimari actually had more of an in-depth meaning to his game. Plus, a blue body works MUCH better for a Ronso than it does for a human being. (Still never understood what that skin condition of Amarant's was. xD)--JohnnyC 03:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. Master Conjurer 03:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. FF X is my first FF game i got and Kimahri is a strong character if used in the right way. my vote stays with the lil ronso#NocturnisEstra100 09:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Makes the cast of FFX a hell of a lot more bearable by diluting the annoyances BritPenance 10:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Gonna give some love to Kimahri partly because I slightly acknwoledges his existence in the game only because I had to beat the crap out of him and because he wasnt a character who was slightly self absorbed. Having Kimahri done something for the other people in the game. Plus X was the game I started with gotta give it some love xD Cryss
  15. MechaUltimaZero 11:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC): Kimahri was actually one of my best characters on my second time through it. I haven't played IX at all, so I can't judge Amarant at all, but Kimahri can (with the proper strategy and equipment setups) use his Overdrive at LEAST every two or three turns. Can Amarant use Trance every single battle for the entire battle without reverting more than once? I think not.
  16. I'm a furry so... Kuzlalala Squee! 12:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  17. Kimahri has much more character development than Amarant, not to mention he is extremely powerful in lower stages. He's also awesome. - Henryacores^ 15:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  18. Amarant is an over used, cliched stereotype. Even if Kimahri is a stereotype (which I doubt), its under utilized. Plus, IX was a generally dissapointing game for me.--Werefang 17:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  19. I really hate Kimahri but since i don't know much about much about Amarant i'll vote for himDestriker73 09:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  20. ronso rage beats elan that simple the 6th angel
  21. BlueLionheart Cloudy Wolf (T/C) 00:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  22. He can easily get Holy and other high White Magics before Yuna does! You just have to spend a long time with him sitting in one place waiting on the right Key Sphere. But I'll admit that this vote is mainly for never having played IX. Nashblade
  23. Genesis rhapsodos: Kimahri is just a deeper character and can become more useful than Amarant in my opinion. #Genesis rhapsodos 05:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  24. Hornless! --Zephyrus11 05:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  25. Because I actully used Kimahri in his game, plus he's blue. Blue > Green/Red.  Armageddon11! Dissicon ff12 Gab2 11:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  26. Amarant sucks in every way possible. He's worse than Tidus, Seplhie and Ultimecia rolled up all into one. Kimahri is awesome. He roars. 1stclasswarrior 18:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  27. This vote mainly counts cause i dont know much about the other character, but Kimahri is pretty damn cool either way. I'd want him on my side in a fight anyday. Keiko2113
  28. Kimahri is the most awesome Ronso ever! His voice made me laugh and he had some pretty cool limit breaks FinalFantasyAerith

Anonymous Votes

  1. I found him more useful than Amarant, I almost never use the throw ability, pretty lame ability 69.108.107.247
  2. I'm not fond of voting against IX but Amarant was a sub par attacker and a pointless addition to the storyline; Kimhari provides steal early on in the game and can use Nova which is extremely useful, plus his love and devotion to Yuna is quite sweet.89.240.78.234 23:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Is Coral an awesome cat thing with a horn? No therefore kimhari is better

206.248.109.31 22:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Peanut Gallery

BfD considers Amarant "hallow"? I find that voting against someone that you revere as holy is odd... unless of course you meant "hollow". Sorry for mocking a spelling error/typo, but it was irresistable XD -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 22:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I beat the "Grammar Nazi" to the "hallow" error -- SN
Nope. Sorry. Look up in the votes for Kimahri: I got it there.Neo Bahamut 00:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
So 22:29 is earlier than 22:23? Check the history: yes, I accidentally made the above critique in the wrong place (sorry!), but I haven't changed the timestamp. I beat you, not that it matters, eh? -- Sorceror Nobody Flan 17:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't know what you're talking about. Your vote came after my comment. I know, 'cause I was sorta there when I made it.Neo Bahamut 23:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
<sigh> Look at the very first comment in this Peanut Gallery. That's the "my comment" that I'm referring to, because I made it before you made your vote -- SN

Oh, joy, another fight I don't care about. I want mah Genesis vs. Kuja! I don't care that it's not my suggestion, it's like the perfect fight, and it may actually get me to vote against FFVII.Neo Bahamut 22:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I got tongue-tied--finger tied--whatever. You'll notice I said "your vote," when you stated it in a comment, & I said "my comment," when I stated it in a vote. I got that part backwards. What I am absolutely certain I am right about is this: My comment & vote was before your interjection. The gallery was empty when I started editing, & while I'm not sure whether or not it made it through FIRST, I did not see your comment in here until a subsequent visit, when I was prompted via E-mail that there were changes (your comment) to the DNC. The talk of time stamps and whatnot is completely irrelevent to me, as I know what I saw. You stated that you put your comment in the wrong place. Did you perhaps put it in the wrong article? Or in the votes? Because I haven't been reading them.Neo Bahamut 22:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
I put it in the wrong place because I'd put it above the thing in here that says <!-- Place your comments below this line-->. In fact, you say you didn't see it, but it was you that removed it the edit you made after mine! Don't believe me? I provide undisputable proof in the form of the page history: click here -- SN
No one cares about Genesis 89.240.78.234 23:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Tell that to the 8 or so votes for the fight.Neo Bahamut 00:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
At least three of which are excited to see Genesis get his ass kicked by Kuja. 92.26.102.36 12:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
And I don't give a shit about Kuja. The.DreadnoughT 03:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Nod.* From what I understand, a lot of people don't. Really, I like 'em both. Despite the manthong & the fanfic-starting that Kuja and Genesis are guilty of, respectively.Neo Bahamut 04:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
I'd also like to see Kuja and Genesis fight. It would be interesting to see. TheBlueDragoon 23:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Woohoo! I'm not alone in this!Neo Bahamut 00:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I've been hoping that one comes up for a while. Kuja and Genesis in the DNC. It would be a sight to see. It's got a good amount of support. I also would like to see my Mog vs Red XIII sometime soon. TheBlueDragoon 18:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I want mah Yuna vs. Aerith! But, I've pretty much given up hope for that, & am throwing my support behind Genesis vs. Kuja.Neo Bahamut 21:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Kimahri isn't exactly getting a lot of love. We've had one-sided fights before. A lot, actually. Sephiroth vs. Kuja was put up as a winning candidate, & those 2 really have nothing in common, besides being a main villain. And I didn't care about this fight or the last one. So, give me one good reason the fight shouldn't go through that can't be traced back to your personal opinion. (I have a topic on Rin's that, in its life, was VERY excited to see Genesis in the DNC, so you are obviously mistaken. Not gonna dig it up, though, as it should be fairly obvious that 3/8 does not "everyone not giving a shit" make.)Neo Bahamut 23:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Cryss Haha I would have to vote for Genesis and I would be more than happy to have an argument with Neo Bahamut over it ;) Anyway this fight didnt really interest me at all I threw down a vote for Kimahri because I kinda felt sorry for him considering him to be the underdog but this is definitely not a fight I honestly care the result of. Oh yeah Kimahri was slightly better IMO xD
I'd have a hard time deciding between the 2. I've never played IX, but Kuja sounds like a pretty good character, & whenever I can, I try to picture the DNC like a battle, which Kuja would most definately win. Genesis is powerful, but Kuja's magic outclasses his. In all honesty, though, I would probably just vote for whoever was losing after a few days.Neo Bahamut 22:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Whoever said Amarant can hit 9999 and Kimahri can't is wrong...Kimahri can hit 99999, as well as every character in X. So your reasoning to vote for Amarant is flawed. Just saying. BoAKaNRikkusmallsig 02:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Ugh I know! A lot of FF characters can do 9999 damage, actually <.< Yzz 03:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
As long as we're nitpicking, she never said Kimahri couldn't hit 9999. Just sayin'.Neo Bahamut 06:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Nokareon: I know this is a rather belated reply, but first of all, I'm not a she. Also, my comment was in reference to Amarant in relation to the other characters in IX, not talking about X at all (correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that only Thievery/Frog Drop/Dragon Crest/No Mercy could deal 9999 in that game, making Zidane/Quina/Freya/Amarant the ideal team, this me saying Amarant was useful. Actually, after looking into it, it looks like Steiner can too, but whatever.)
"and can actually hit 9999, making him not useless like Kimahri." The comment is being said as if Kimahri cannot hit 9999. Sorry but perhaps you should read carefully. Just sayin'...again. BoAKaNRikkusmallsig 07:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I was reading a different one. And, to nitpick again, it's entirely possible that the vote could be taking relativity of damage between FFs into account. What does that mean? Well, it's kind of like what Rai Balmung says, below me.Neo Bahamut 23:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
But is really easy hit 9999 (and more) in FFX. It isn't in FFIX (I didn't remember me hitting more than 7k, but I can be mistaken). Ah, can you fix your vote? The Rikku's picture of your sign took a second vote. Rai Balmung, the gargoyle 15:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I almost felt like drop kicking Master Conjurer for his supposed Twitter link, but I laughed my ass off instead; I'm curious, so sue me User:Leiber_Mage

If you want to follow me on Twitter, the link on my user page is real. Master Conjurer 11:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually it was more about 'why would you put twitter in a vote?' then anything else XD User:Leiber_Mage

It was part of my signature. It was everywhere I've conversed. Master Conjurer 19:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see, nevermind then XP User:Leiber Mage

*sigh*OK, somebdy voted for Kimahri when they said that they hated him. Look people, if you hate somebody, then you shouldn't vote for them in the DNC unless you hate the other guy even more! MechaUltimaZero 11:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

There's quite a lot of unsigned votes up there... :/ SamSandy 08:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe the anonymous users need a visual aid...
While editing, your vote should look something like this example:
#This is an example of a signed (and therefore correct) anonymous vote that will actually count, rather than wasting your time. ~~~~

When you click Preview, it looks something like

  1. This is an example of a signed (and therefore correct) anonymous vote that will actually count, rather than wasting your time. 1.2.3.4

So now that you have two examples of how to do it, GO SIGN YOUR DAMN VOTES (then sit down and drink your goddamned tea!), you anonymous people! The.DreadnoughT 17:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Lately I've started to get the feeling that the "sign your votes" reminders seems to be needed even among non-anonymous users. there is at least one vote for each character that's in the registered section and isn't signed in any way, wouldn't those be deleted as well? Celythia

Hated them both, never used either. - Saraija Merinas

Older Fights!

You can find older fights in the Archives for the Dragon's Neck Colosseum. All of these fights are closed, so don't bother voting. All new votes will be removed.