Final Fantasy Wiki
Advertisement
Gilgamesh-ffv-ios-portrait.png
Gilgamesh: Enough expository banter!
This talk page is used for discussing improvements to the page "Gilgamesh". It is not the place for general discussion or sharing stories about the topic of this article.

I think perhaps this could be expanded beyond just Gilgamesh's appearances. Perhaps related concepts? - Enkidu, perhaps Excalibur and Excalipoor, maybe even Bartz and Gilgamesh's other swords. Doreiku Kuroofangu 14:25, August 12, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not even sure why Gilgamesh needs his own category, but if he's gonna have one, we might as well include things related to him too. -- Some Color Mage ~ (Talk) 14:27, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
I think Cat's line of reasoning was something along the lines of "If Chaos and Cid can have one, Gilgamesh can have one", but I could be wrong on that I suppose? Jimcloud 14:29, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
Correct. Cid had a category, some anon tried to add Chaos to a category that didn't exist, so why not make the Chaos category and make a category for the last member of the Big Three, Gilgamesh?
Anyways, I added Clash on the Big Bridge. Enkidu, Excalibur, and Excalipoor could certainly go in this cat as well. C A T U S E 15:43, August 12, 2012 (UTC)

When we have Cid, Chaos, and Gilgamesh, why would we need categories for them? Parents group all the pages, we don't also need a category.

Of course, consensus is what counts, but I really don't see logic.

Also I would be careful what you would add to such a category. The Excalibur does have significant relation to Gilgamesh, yes, but it also relates to others. I suppose it would be fine, but then we get to things such as Buster Sword and then you must really question: Since all of these are linked on the Gilgamesh parent page, do we really need the category? 79.69.220.228 15:54, August 12, 2012 (UTC)

Advertisement