Since I got the remaster bundle I've played 4, 6, 1 and just finished 4 again. Eventually I'll be playing the rest of these but not sure where to start. Figured I'd make a poll to get opinions or just go in order of release.

Although it's not my favorite from the three, I believe FFV's gameplay and story will be better to start.

FFII's gameplay can be tricky, and it's never actually explained in the game, as far as I'm concerned, which doesn't help, but the game is good (one of my 8 favorites).

I can't really give an opinion about FFIII as I never played it, but apparently the Pixel Remaster did tone down its difficulty and made it more enjoyable.

Perfectly balanced as all things should be

Final Fantasy III, since the Third Installment was never released outside of Japan for over Three Decades until last year, in the bundle of Pixel Remaster on all computer and console ports.

Oh, and I am talking about the 1990 version of Final Fantasy III with Four Onion Knights (with one making it into the Dissidia Series), not the 2012 version with the Four New Characters: Refia, Ingus, Luneth, and Arc.

And No, Emulators of Final Fantasy III in the 90s don't count either, as they do not contribute to the official release of Final Fantasy III.

Question: Is it Onion Knight, Refia, Ingus, Luneth, or Arc, who is the Main Unnamed Character with the two swords, and is in between the words 'Final' and 'Fantasy III', that is on the Front of Final Fantasy III?

Onion Knight is the one in the cover art of FFIII. Pretty obvious, though.

Thanks @CorujinhaGamer26 👍😇.

This is a bit surprising. I was expecting 5 or 3 to win but 2 took the lead despite what I've heard about it (passwords and stat growth).